N
Newhills
Guest
The points of how it shows modesty & virtue.What good point’s?
The points of how it shows modesty & virtue.What good point’s?
Exactly. Every married couple has had an exchange like that. Did she mean “would it inconvenience you at all if I went to the gym?”Does she think she needs to get your permission because you have absolute authority over her or is it a courtesy to check that you didn’t have other plans with her, such as going on a hike? There’s a big difference in that versus something like “I just don’t like you doing that” or “you need to stay home because I said so”.
A woman who thinks she needs (but sometimes may not be able to get) her husband’s permission to go to.the store while he is at work and buy urgently-needed supplies that have run out? Certainly doesn’t show.the virtues of wisdom.or prudence, which dictate that she does.what needs doing as soon as it needs doing and shouldn’t have to wait for permission.
Both. They aren’t exclusive.Does she think she needs to get your permission because you have absolute authority over her or is it a courtesy to check that you didn’t have other plans with her, such as going on a hike? There’s a big difference in that versus something like “I just don’t like you doing that” or “you need to stay home because I said so”.
Was the thing she wanted to do inappropriate? Like, “im going to meet my ex-boyfriend for a romantic dinner and then we’re going to go hit the club?” or are we talking something mundane like “I’m going to the gym” or “I’m going to the store”?Yes, there have been times when my response was “no, I just do not like you doing that”. She didn’t do it. There’s no fights, no arguments, no marriage counselling.
Most of us do not have or wish to exercise some kind of arbitrary veto power over our wives. If I told my wife I was really uncomfortable with her doing something, she’d refrain, but if the reason was just “because I said so and I’m the boss” I don’t think that would go over well, nor should it.I fail to understand how that is a bad thing.
One that comes to memory - back when she had a part time job she wanted to go out for after work drinks on a Friday night with people from the office in the city.It’s a bad thing if she’s treated as a child. As in, “because I said so and that’s why”. You haven’t given an indication that you’d reply like that, but I think that’s where most of the concern about this topic on the thread is coming from.
And I wanted a wide, not a partner. I wanted a partner not a personal assistant.
I wanted my wife to be a partner, not a servant. If I didn’t think she had good judgment, character and intellect, such that she didn’t need me to sign a pass for her to leave the house, I wouldn’t have married her.And I wanted a wide, not a partner
I don’t think anyone is picturing you standing over your cowering, terrified wife holding a belt. We get that you’re not keeping her chained to the stove or something.Again - you’re conjuring these up to be BIG things but to her and I they are not
I didn’t say my wife is my servant.I wanted my wife to be a partner, not a servant.
I feel like the thread is full of “wives can do anything they please & they don’t answer to their husbands”. They do (or should). It’s not a bad thing.That’s reasonable. You told her your concern and all was well. You didn’t say “because I’m the husband and I said so”. That’s what is bringing about all the concern on this thread and it stems back to the OP’s question, she who is inquiring about Catholicism ,and some of the subsequent posts that appear to indicate that a Catholic wife is to be treated like nothing more than some child who needs micromanaging in all things and must not be allowed to think for herself, as she is now the property of her husband instead of the partner God created for him.
For the record, even though I was disagreeing with you, it wasn’t me. People are way too quick to throw flags around here.An anonymous person has flagged me for three different posts on this thread, for reasons unknown to me. I don’t know what the limit is, but this is what will get me kicked off of CAF - at least for a month, maybe more.
I’m sorry I cannot continue in this discussion.
What’s the decision about? There are some things my wife defers to me on. Finances, for example. Not because I’m the man, but because I have a better head for that stuff.There has to be a head of the household. It’s simple fact. When it comes right down to it, and you & your partner wife disagree on a decision - who makes that decision?
This is not the same thing as asking for permission to leave the house. My husband and I have had any number of occasions when I have wanted to do something for some reason or another, and he has asked me not to. If it is important enough to him to ask me not to do something, I don’t do it. This comes from our relationship of trust.One that comes to memory - back when she had a part time job she wanted to go out for after work drinks on a Friday night with people from the office in the city.
I did not consider it to be a good idea & told her that. She didn’t go.
In my family, it usually comes down to who cares the most or who will be most impacted by the decision.When it comes right down to it, and you & your partner wife disagree on a decision - who makes that decision?
I appreciate it and I’ll take a moment to apologize for personal comments towards you. That was a heated response from me and not right. Thanks.For the record, even though I was disagreeing with you, it wasn’t me. People are way too quick to throw flags around here.