Of course you may. In your description, where are the needs of the wife. Your wife may be strong physically, she has to be with all she has to do but she can’t voice her feelings or have her say unless her husband permits her to. I have to say that your wife seems like the newest Stepford wife.
You do have the right to live the way you do and to say what you say. I have to say that Christ does not demand that wives live the way you say they should.
(First, for the record, I’m not addressing the other half of the verses in Eph. because those aren’t the discussion at hand, and I’m not a husband. I’d sure talk about “Husbands, love your wives” but the topic I’ve been concerned with so far is “Wives, submit to your own husbands.” So it’s not that I’ve forgotten the double-mandate, just that only one is the subject right now.)
Who said the wife can’t voice her feelings? God pity the wife who can’t approach her husband if her heart is troubled. BUT that doesn’t give her license to bring him down into her misery so they can both have a pity party and dwell on all that’s wrong in their lives. That’s not how it works. If she’s going to just complain and poop around, nobody wants to deal with that. Everybody’s entitled to a little bit of healthy catharsis, but once a person dwells in that place, it drives everyone else away. How many people who constantly have some crisis or devastating illness they can’t wait to tell you about do you look forward to seeing?
That said, a wife can share her feelings; I don’t know where you got the idea that being a submissive wife meant you have to suppress your feelings and needs, but in any proper godly relationship, the self comes last, especially when there are children. I know it’s a popular philosophy, but I hate that mentality that says “I need to take care of ME before I can take care of others.” That’s exactly the opposite of how God created us. We were made to love each other, as Christ loved us. Can you imagine how the redemption history would be different if Jesus had said, “I can’t go on the Cross today, I’m overworked and stressed out; I just need some ME TIME.” The obsession with self is never healthy, least of all in a marriage.
If I have something that is grieving my heart, I know I can talk to my husband, and he will guide me and help me through it. He will offer solutions so I don’t sit on my pity pot all day. He will be the uplifting support, rather than an isolating sympathizer. Likewise if I am happy about something, I share it with him and double our happiness. And since my husband is confident in his authority in our home, he can ask me and I can give my thoughts and feelings on issues and decisions, without it being a challenge or an argument. If we disagree, he gets the final say because he is my husband. If he does something I think is unwise, so be it. I will shut my mouth and trust him because my marriage is more important than a few dollars or something stupid like that.
Besides, I’m too busy to be a Stepford wife. A wife plans ahead to see her family’s needs are met. For the person who mentioned shining shoes earlier, if that man were married, his shoes would already have been shined because his wife would have seen the need and met it, then she could have the satisfaction of knowing she did something to please and ease her husband. Besides, a Stepford wife is a moron, a good wife is not. She is wise and eager to learn more, and apply her knowledge and wisdom. As far as “needs,” they are met well, and my husband is eager to meet them because he knows the hard work I put in each day to make sure he’s happy to come home. I keep a garden (well, three little ones) for my own pleasure. I write, paint, and bake when I am done with my work. I know this may not work for all women, but I think that’s probably going to be because a lot of women have a skewed sense of what “submission” means. My husband is the captain, I’m the first mate. When captain’s gone, I’m in charge of everything. When he’s here, he has first and final say.
No Christ didn’t say so explicitly, but he did expect to be served by Mary and Martha, the woman at the well, and he definitely didn’t turn away the service of the woman caught in sin. What kind of cow would modern feminists have if a woman came weeping into a dinner party and washed the men’s feet? Rather she was blessed for seeing his need and addressing it, rather than going therapy shopping and getting some “me time.”
The needs of the wife are the husband’s concern because he loves her; the needs of the husband are the wife’s concern.