No one is saying don’t look into what happened and try to do better next time. But as things sit, even if the allegations are true it will not change the result. We can do both- move ahead with the proper certified result, and still look at any failings and try to implement change for the better.The field is muddied, that is for sure. But we should just accept this as is with no investigation let alone a resolution?
No, disenfranchising millions of people is not the proper result of a handful of allegations of mostly de minimus problems. The courts will deal with these small fry complaints in due course.When the law calls for ONLY the state legislature to be making election laws,
but an election official CHANGES those laws unilaterally,
or a judge does so,
or the precinct captains kicking Republican people out,
it leaves you with no recourse but to disqualify all that subset of non-lawful votes (i.e. ones not post marked in time is just one example regarding a plethora of cheating and irregularities that the MSM and Big Social Media is attempting to hide from the American people).
They will in due course. It is not time yet for them to certify. The electors are not selected until December. Which states have said that their reported election results are false?Yet I am not aware of one state certifying him yet.
hehe, I have no idea what Rumble is. However, there are multiple lawsuits going on about the election. Not all will go through, and I personally do not see how can the lawsuits change the results.What is Rumble and why do we care?
I am a realist. If Trump wins fair and square through the courts you have to go with it. I think most people would think Biden was robbed.That said. Will you accept the results if the courts decide that Trump did in fact win? Oy Vey. I do not know how to feel about that. You?
I guess a man that denies science isn’t terribly interested in math either.Even if the recount goes his way and he gets back Georgia and Pennsylvania he still loses I don’t see the point.
Legacy media are lying when they claim that all of President Trump’s allegations of voter fraud are baseless. I know, because I argued a case on the president’s behalf in federal court in Philadelphia.
Looks to be a video sharing site, like YouTube.What is Rumble and why do we care?
This looks like they are just taking the case that already got dismissed and are filing it again.Judges in the Michigan Court of Claims and the Wayne County Circuit Court have already denied similar requests to stop the counting of Detroit ballots, citing a lack of evidence of wrongdoing.
The existence of a lawsuit doesn’t imply the merits of a claim. Anyone can file a lawsuit. No evidence needed. But add to this that some of these lawsuits have been put before a judge and the lawyers didn’t have evidence to present, resulting in them being dismissed.However, there are multiple lawsuits going on about the election.
It’s a PR campaign parading as a legal campaign.Even if the recount goes his way and he gets back Georgia and Pennsylvania he still loses I don’t see the point.
Voter fraud on any scale here disenfranchises every other vote.No, disenfranchising millions of people is not the proper result of a handful of allegations of mostly de minimus problems.
Then quit calling Biden “President-elect”.It is not time yet for them to certify.
How do you figure? If 150 million people vote, and two of those vote are fraudulent, you would throw out the other 149,999,998? There has to be proportionality in any proposed remedy. Of course first there has to be evidence of some actual problem, which has yet to be seen.Voter fraud on any scale here disenfranchises every other vote.
:shrug Biden won. Whether he gets called “President-elect” now, or when the states certify, or when the electoral college votes - doesn’t really matter to me. Technically, it is probably only correct after the electoral college votes, but that is only going to require the passage of time at this point.Then quit calling Biden “President-elect”.