‘The Steal Is On’ in Pennsylvania: Poll Watchers Denied Access, Illegal Campaigning at Polling Locations

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cathoholic
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
TMC . . .
shrug Biden won.
Click to expand...
You may very well be right TMC.

But you may very well be wrong too.

Either way, looking at this carefully is necessary given all the frau-er, ah hem, I mean given all the “irregularities”.
 
Cathoholic said:
Because your figures are invented that’s how.
Click to expand...
They aren’t “my” figures. The states have counted the votes, and Biden won. Until there is some evidence otherwise, this is all just noise. Or a fund raising grift. Probably both. The idea that judges will just throw out all the votes and declare Trump the winner is sheer fantasy.
 
TMC . . .
Until there is some evidence otherwise, this is all just noise.
Click to expand...
There is “evidence”. Lots of evidence. But you won’t hear of it.

So you will have to think whatever you want.
Just like the media’s myrmidons did with the Russian Collusion hoax that victimized them.

(BTW. I am not suggesting “you” fell for that. I don’t even recall you posting one way or the other on the collusion spoof that so many leftists fell for – hook, line, and sinker. )

Look. Go ahead and think whatever you want to think.

But I am not going to think that way.

(A myrmidon is an “unquestioning follower” taken from mythology).

In the meantime, bring on the investigation.
 
Last edited:

Pennsylvania Auditors Warned of Dead People, Duplicates on State Voter Rolls​

2,912

(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)

AP Photo/Julie Carr Smyth

JOHN BINDER

10 Nov 2020

Pennsylvania auditors alerted officials of possible dead people and duplicate registrations on the state’s voter rolls last year, but the warnings went unacknowledged.

In December 2019, Pennsylvania’s Department of Auditor General (DAG) released the findings of an audit report conducted January 1, 2016 to April 16, 2019 but was limited in scope because of “a lack of cooperation and a failure to provide the necessary information by” Pennyslvania’s Department of State, the Department of Transportation, and four county election offices. . . .

. . . Even without cooperation from state agencies and multiple county election offices, the report “identified tens of thousands of potential duplicate and inaccurate voter records, as well as voter records for nearly three thousand potentially deceased voters that had not been removed” from Pennsylvania voter rolls.

Specifically, the report analyzed the voter registration records for the state’s more than 8.5 million voters and alerted the Pennsylvania Secretary of State of “potential inaccuracies,” including:
  • 24,408 cases where a driver’s license number was listed in more than one voter record
  • 13,913 potential duplicate voter registrations
  • 6,876 potential date of birth inaccuracies
  • 2,230 potential date of birth and/or registration date inaccuracies
  • 2,991 records of potentially deceased voters
On the issue of dead people on Pennsylvania’s voter rolls, at least 2,094 of the 2,991 identified by auditors had their death notices sent to the Secretary of State’s office so the voter registration would be canceled . . .

. . . The full report can be read here . . .
Click to expand...
 
TMC above posting a WaPo article that alleges postal worker “recants” claims of fraud.

.

Here is the primary source being interviewed.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1326337154050641920

I am afraid you are the next in line that was victimized by leftist FAKE NEWS TMC. In this case WaPO.

Pennsylvania Postal worker’s claims of voter fraud come under question​

Conflicting reports released Tuesday are at odds over whether the worker recanted his fraud allegations​

By Brittany De Lea

Richard Hopkins, a mail carrier from Erie, Pa., accused his boss of instructing employees to pick up and bring him ballots that were received after Election Day. Hopkins said he overheard his boss discussing backdating postmarks to make the ballots appear as though they had been collected by Nov. 3, instead of Nov. 4 or after.

In order for ballots to have been eligible in the state, they needed to be postmarked by Election Day.

On Monday, Hopkins is said to have signed an affidavit recanting those claims, which appeared to be confirmed in a tweet by Democrats on the House Oversight Committee. . . .

. . . The Washington Post, which cited three officials briefed on the investigation, also said Hopkins allegedly admitted to U.S. Postal Service investigators that claims of widespread voting irregularities were fabricated.

However, Project Veritas – the far-right activist group which aired Hopkins’ initial claims – posted a video to its Twitter page on Tuesday, which appeared to show Hopkins saying he did not recant his statements, along with the promise that more details would be released on Wednesday. . . .

. . . Project Veritas also released recordings that purportedly show an investigator attempting to convince Hopkins to change his narrative. . . .
Click to expand...

From the WaPo article . . .
But on Monday, Hopkins, 32, told investigators from the U.S. Postal Service’s Office of Inspector General that the allegations were not true, and he signed an affidavit recanting his claims, according to officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe an ongoing investigation.
Click to expand...
From the actual investigation questioning (that has obviously been leaked to the WaPo with some partial truths injected into it). . . . .

https://bit.ly/2JO47Qe

This WaPo story suggests our intelligence people are LEAKING this to WaPo. If that’s the case, I wonder WHY they would do that??

People will whine against Project Veritas, but look at the original videos (linked by me here) and the conclusions are easy to draw.

No “recant” by the postal worker according to himself. Lots of pressure to recant from investigators though.

Apparent leaking partial truths to WaPo by investigators.
WaPo printing FAKE news.

Twitter putting warning on Project Veritas despite having primary source material posted!
Twitter NOT putting any warnings (that I am aware of) against WaPo.

The usual stuff.
 
Last edited:
I am re-posting those Project Veritas Twitter links.

The bitly one already dead-linked.

.

Here is the postal workers videoed claims. . . .

https://twitter.com/x/status/1326337154050641920

And here is the postal worker being interviewed about him being interrogated with snippets of his questioning too . . .

https://twitter.com/x/status/1326323334800437248

.

Here is FoxNews implicitly lashing out against WaPo for FAKE News
or at least partial-truth “news”
(with a big"I did not recant" printed on the story’s graphic link).

(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)

.

Here you can see Twitter issue a warning to readers saying:

“This claim about election fraud is disputed” (in red at the bottom of the screen capture).

Twitter by the way, has no such postings (that I am aware of anyway) that says . . .

“This claim about NO election fraud is disputed”

even though that claim IS disputed too,

(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)
.

And here is the NetFlix video called “The Social Dilemma” official trailer. A documentary that everyone should see to give you insight into that same Twitter (and FaceBook, Google, etc. etc.).

 
Last edited:
Ken Starr may ultimately be right about how the Penn SC handled this election. I am not sure he will be - there are interesting constitutional questions involved. But there is no doubt that there are not enough votes implicated to change the result. Because of that, the Supreme Court may not even take it up.
 
Cathoholic said:
Voter fraud on any scale here disenfranchises every other vote.
Click to expand...
Huh? That does not follow logically. Freeloading anywhere detracts from the fact that I do my job?

Vote fraud is a binary experience – One cheat is one vote in error. No more, no less.

"PHILADELPHIA — Election officials in dozens of states representing both political parties said that there was no evidence that fraud or other irregularities played a role in the outcome of the presidential race, amounting to a forceful rebuke of President Trump’s portrait of a fraudulent election.

Over the last several days, the president, members of his administration, congressional Republicans and right wing allies have put forth the false claim that the election was stolen from Mr. Trump and have refused to accept results that showed Joseph R. Biden Jr. as the winner.

But top election officials across the country said in interviews and statements that the process had been a remarkable success despite record turnout and the complications of a dangerous pandemic.

“There’s a great human capacity for inventing things that aren’t true about elections,” said Frank LaRose, a Republican who serves as Ohio’s secretary of state. “The conspiracy theories and rumors and all those things run rampant. For some reason, elections breed that type of mythology.”

 
Last edited:
Cathoholic said:
Then quit calling Biden “President-elect”.
Click to expand...
Biden is “President-elect”. The results say so.

What is happening is a challenge to the results. The onus is on the challengers to prove that Biden does not deserve the title. So far, the challengers certainly have not done so.
 
vz71 said:
There is a specific process to be followed, until then, he is not president elect.
Click to expand...
okay 🤷‍♀️

This inspired me to do a search though. I see articles referring to “President Elect Trump” before the Electoral college met in 2016. Was there the same type of scrutiny on semantics then? Not that it matters, that was 4 years ago.
 
vz71 said:
Fact.
There is a specific process to be followed, until then, he is not president elect.
Click to expand...
In recent history, the Media has called the winner of the election and both parties have agreed, due to they see the same as the media. I do not know of a time when an election was not called by the media in recent History and been recanted for the President of the United States.

As we know, Biden is the President Elect. However, Trump is going to court. That can be the change. But, until then. Biden is the elect by the media. The same way Trump was called the elect by the media in 2016.

Trump will have his day in the courts and if there is plenty of evidence, then there will be a massive plot twist to 2020. But life is more boring than that.

I do not trust the news much. But, Trump is not president elect at the moment. Let the courts deal with that. If it changes, well. I think I will hide with my family for a few months, I think.
 
Cathoholic . . .
Voter fraud on any scale here disenfranchises every other vote.
Click to expand...
Nepperhan . . .
Huh? That does not follow logically.
Click to expand...
Sure it does.

It cancels out my vote.

And incrementally changes the whole election result.
Not necessarily the whole election outcome (although it MAY do that too)
but result.
And it does so illicitly.
This is true for every single cheat-vote. A small incremental injury to the system, and a vote cancel-out for a real voter.

I stand by my post.
 
Last edited:
Rockoh22 said:
In recent history, the Media has called the winner of the election and both parties have agreed, due to they see the same as the media. I do not know of a time when an election was not called by the media in recent History and been recanted for the President of the United States.
Click to expand...
That the media accurately projects the winner does not, in fact, provide the media with the power to appoint the title “president-elect”.
Until the process is completed, neither is winner of this race.
Rockoh22 said:
As we know, Biden is the President Elect.
Click to expand...
No.
Not until the electoral vote is tallied and the states certify.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top