‘The Steal Is On’ in Pennsylvania: Poll Watchers Denied Access, Illegal Campaigning at Polling Locations

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cathoholic
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
sallybutler said:
This is from the title of the complaint. The typos are not mine. And this is the problem with this group. They don’t pay attention to the details.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICCT COURT, NORTHERN
DISTRCOICT OF GEORGIA, ATLANTA DIVISION
Click to expand...
I looked for it on my PACER account (US courts website) and can’t find it. The posted lawsuit has no case number, misspells district, and misspells the name of her expert witness.

This wasn’t filed.
 
Please stop posting videos.

No one watches them. Post a description of what was said, or link to an actual article.
 
Thank you Caldera for posting these videos.

I am watching at least some of them.

And if I don’t have time on the others I often glean through bits and pieces.
 
Last edited:
Jeanne_S said:
Truth Will Out!
Click to expand...
Seems like it has (there is a 0% chance the Supreme Court takes this case):

“Voters, not lawyers, choose the President. Ballots, not briefs, decide elections,” Judge Stephanos Bibas — an appointee of President Donald Trump — wrote for the three-judge Third Circuit Court of Appeals panel. Bibas’ 21-page opinion rejected the campaign’s appeal of a district court ruling that similarly shredded the suit.

 
I agree…voters choose the president .Not fraudulent means such as are being exposed to ensure JB victory.He didn’t really win,I know you ,Iknow it ,we all know it.
 
If you want to skip, just read the parts in bold.

Federal appeals court denies Trump campaign effort to revive Pennsylvania lawsuit saying ‘claims have no merit’ - CNNPolitics

(CNN)A federal appeals court denied the Trump campaign’s effort to revive a federal lawsuit challenging the election results in Pennsylvania, ruling “the claims have no merit.”

A panel of three judges for the Third Circuit Court of Appeals denied the request by the Trump campaign, led by Rudy Giuliani, to amend its lawsuit, which had been previously rejected.

“The Campaign never alleges that any ballot was fraudulent or cast by an illegal voter,” the judges wrote. “It never alleges that any defendant treated the Trump campaign or its votes worse than it treated the Biden campaign or its votes. Calling something discrimination does not make it so. The Second Amended Complaint still suffers from these core defects, so granting leave to amend would have been futile.”

The President and some of his allies have been questioning the legitimacy of the 2020 election, saying without evidence that it was fraudulent and seeking to use legal battles to overturn results in key states.

The judges also rejected the President’s motion to undo Pennsylvania’s certification of votes.

“The Campaign’s claims have no merit. The number of ballots it specifically challenges is far smaller than the roughly 81,000-vote margin of victory. And it never claims fraud or that any votes were cast by illegal voters. Plus, tossing out millions of mail-in ballots would be drastic and unprecedented, disenfranchising a huge swath of the electorate and upsetting all down-ballot races too. That remedy would be grossly disproportionate to the procedural challenges raised,” the judges wrote.
 
Last edited:
Jeanne_S said:
He didn’t really win,I know you ,Iknow it ,we all know it.
Click to expand...
I’m certain the Third Circuit Court of Appeals will take your position under advisement.

You can ask Rudy if he’ll let you file an amicus brief if the Supreme Court grants cert (it won’t).
 
The lies are starting to show like the 'pipe burst" in GA on election night which stopped the vote counting but city documents show it happened during the morning and in another part of the building. Where there is 1 lie there are many more.
 
Last edited:
Cathoholic said:
Do you think there is a zero chance the Supreme Court is going to take ANY election case?
Click to expand...
It might take something esoteric that has a specific legal impact on something other than the results. It will take NOTHING that has an impact on the results of the presidential election.

The reason? As every court, so far, has said: there is no evidence of fraud.
 
Joy01 said:
The SC just put out their circuit assignments on November 20th.
Click to expand...
It’s worth noting that justices typically represent the circuit they are from, or have some connection to.

In cases with such high visibility for the court, they will certainly confer with the other eight before rejecting the emergency appeal. And they will be rejected.
 
Do have personal insight others don’t, saying that they will be rejected?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top