C
Cathoholic
Guest
The fact that you’d ask that tells me you don’t really want a serious conversation.Are you fine with 2 deaths a minute?
The fact that you’d ask that tells me you don’t really want a serious conversation.Are you fine with 2 deaths a minute?
Why not? You don’t appear troubled by it.The fact that you’d ask that tells me you don’t really want a serious conversation.
I haven’t said that either.You want end all mitigation policies, right?
For the umpty ninth and final time . . . . Mitigation does not decrease or increase the number of deaths. At least directly.That would increase the number of death, wouldn’t it?
Then what do you want?In fact I have said something quite different (but it doesn’t seem to matter to you. As you have said. You do not understand what I am telling you.)
Were both too good to want to fall into condescension against one another.Explain it to me like I’m a stupid child.
Then explain it to me like I’m an elderly genius.Were both too good to want to fall into condescension against one another.
Yes, @Cathoholic. I would like to know your approach as well. Despite you claiming to have given it, none of us can find it.Cathoholic:![]()
Then explain it to me like I’m an elderly genius.Were both too good to want to fall into condescension against one another.
Either way, tell me what mitigation measures you think we should be using. Kindly.
No.I would like to know your approach as well. Despite you claiming to have given it, none of us can find it.
Motherwit . . .
Well readers, there you have it. An approach that amounts to being agin the government ‘just because’.I would like to know your approach as well. Despite you claiming to have given it, none of us can find it.
I havent what?You haven’t interiorized anything I said to you.
At least that’s what it looks like to me.
So go ahead and think whatever you want. I’m fine with that.
Is that a yes or a no?The fact that you’d ask that tells me you don’t really want a serious conversation.
You have told me several times to get enraged.Get enraged about an . . .
ThinkingSapien said:I remember someone trying to comically present the position in a show when some people turn against someone for not being sufficiently outraged at something that had happened.
There were some incidents during the summer of protesting when protestors engaged in intimidating behavior to people that had not repeated their cries back to them. I thought this was wrong.
Well, that’s an answer.I would like to know your approach as well. Despite you claiming to have given it, none of us can find it.
I really don’t want to get involved in another political thread on here (least of all one that is already 117 posts long), but you are absolutely right. I have also spoken to friends of mine who work at hospitals, and they have said pretty much the same thing. I have a friend who has been a doctor for over 15 years, most of that time working in emergency medicine, and he says that this has been the first time that he has come home from work and been unable to sleep because he is so worried about his patients and he knows that some of them will be dead by the time his next shift begins. He, and another mutual friend of ours who is a nurse at a different hospital, have both been infected. I cannot claim to know what the solution is, and I know that there are reasonable people on all sides of the debate, but I really wish that people would not make this into a political issue and that they would just let the actual experts get on with their jobs.Have you talked to anyone who works at a hospital? I have.
I really wish that too. But with the political buddy exception clause (that is lived out), it is evident that there is at least a political dimension to all of this.I really wish that people would not make this into a political issue and that they would just let the actual experts get on with their jobs.
No. What got us here are people with attitudes like those walking into my daughter’s medical clinic and yelling at her and the other medical providers about how stupid they are for wearing masks. What got us here were people who insist that their “right” to go maskless overrode other peoples "right’ to life (note that they are the same people who get incensed over someone smoking within 10 miles of them). What got us here were people who insist, even as they lay dying in the hospital from Covid-19, that it is all a head fake and really not very serious.Well StudentMI. Keep telling yourself that. Because that is what got us here.
False.That is what got us here.