Dear Bro. Thistle,
The last thing that I intend to do is to upset you with my postings. If this is the effect they are having, I believe it would be best if you just ignore them.
I realize what the Church says about Freemasons and assure you that if I thought that I was placing my soul in jeopardy of eternal damnation in any way I would run away from the Freemasons at lightening speed!
I believe that the Church is made an error in it’s ruling on Freemasonry.
I also do not believe that all writings of the Pope are necessarily right–or even good for that matter. A few other of the papal bulls I have disagreed with are:
Ad abolendam
Ad exstirpanda
Unam sanctam
Dum Diversas
Cum nimis absurdum
What I have asked I will ask again. Why is the Church against Freemasonry?
The only substantial reason I may conjure up is that prohibition stems more from almost 1,000 year old historical event than any type of moral or theological reason.
Freemasonry has been a topic of threads on CAF for at least a year–probably more. During my tenure on this wonderful forum, many have said–and fairly so–why question the teachings of the Church?
Quite simply I would prefer to go to mass if I was just going to ditto the teachings of the Church. It is in CAF that I can ask for answers.
Please accept my apology if you see this as a bad thing.
As for the question of eternal damnation (ie going to hell). My soul is at ease and my conscious is clean. I hold to the claim that being a Freemason is not a sin anymore than being an accountant or being an American.
I pray more for the souls of those who, all while knowing the truth, wrongly accuse (and many unjustly profiting from) false allegations against Freemasonry (or any other person or organization for that matter) because bearing false witness is a sin.
Once again I thank you for reading my posting–if it in any way bothers you–my feelings will not be hurt if you choose to ignore it.
Thank you–your brother in Christ,
Then my friend you are committing heresy.
You are publicly declaring yourself to be a Freemason while being a Catholic.
You are publicly declaring the Church teaching is wrong.
You are stubbornly rejecting the Church teaching (definition of heresy) on Freemasonry.
The Church has made it clear you are in a state of mortal sin and cannot receive Holy Communion.
I will pray for you because its sad when a person puts himself above the Church which Christ established and gave authority to.
Thistle,
Once again thank you very much for your posting. I appreciate the time you have spent in replying.
After reading what a heretic is and what heresy is, I suppose the title which you have given me to be an accurate one because I do disagree with the Church.
Not being brought up in the Catholic faith–I was raised Baptist–this must not have quite the sting to it that it would for someone who lives in fear of the label.
Furthermore to your point, I would be called a heretic for being against the Papal Bulls listed below:
**Ad Exstirpanda **(May 15, 1252 by Pope Innocent IV) - the use of torture for obtaining a confession,
**Romanus Pontifex ** (January 8, 1455 by Pope Nicholas V) - permission to enslave and take land from non-Christians,
Cum nimis absurdum (July 14, 1555 by Pope Paul IV) - reinstates the economic restrictions on Jewish people in the Papal States,
I am most certain that there are a few others that I have missed.
Speaking of being a Baptist. As I have said before, the preacher at the Baptist church I grew up in was a mason (may he rest in peace) along with about half of the deacons of the church. The congressman from my hometown, Hon. Ralph M. Hall, is a mason (he’s still the congressman there too). Most of the leaders of the town were also masons.
The founding fathers of my state were also masons–Stephen Austin, Sam Houston, Mirabeau Lamar, Lorenzo de Zavala, Juan Seguin, James Bowie, and many more.
The founding fathers of my country were also masons–George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, John Handcock, and once again many more.
The leaders of the last century were also masons–Theodore Roosevelt, FDR, Trumen, Ford, etc.
There is nothing trivial or trite about the organization of Freemasonry. It is neither a religion nor cult.
I stand by what I have said and until shown differently, the Church has made it a mistake on it’s prohibition of Freemasonry (I think it also made a mistake on the issuance of the other above listed Papal Bulls as well–which I hope have since been retracted).
The only reason(s) I have seen for the Church to be against Freemasonry deal(s) more with history (ie Templar Knights), and appears to be more of vindicative reasons, than anything that affects us in the modern era.
Once again thank you for your time and for reading my post.