C
Cathoholic
Guest
What are you alluding to? You have only been here for two days!
(How many threads could that possibly involve??)
.
OK. That is your opinion.
I disagree.
Last edited:
- Status
(How many threads could that possibly involve??)
.
I disagree.
M
mojoalthor
Guest
I have browsed all of the current threads. And the same pattern emerges.
T
TMC
Guest
You are correct. Actually, to get to 50 posts before a thread is hijacked by BUT ABORTION posts (regardless of the original topic) is pretty good for CAF these days. It usually starts in the first ten.
M
mojoalthor
Guest
It would probably be easier to count how many threads that have not turned into abortion threads.
In addition as simple search using the tool clearly depicts this.(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)
There are thousands of threads that don’t have abortion in the title that end up invoking abortion.
C
Cathoholic
Guest
.
OK. As long as you are talking about the search function . . .
Have you posted at all here on the OP video??
Did you watch the video before posting?
Because for all your complaining about being off-topic, I have not seen one post from you here concerning the OP.
Here are all of them or almost all . . . .
here
here
here
here
here
here
or here.
.
Now is your chance to post on the OP.
Did you watch the OP video before posting?
Last edited:
M
mojoalthor
Guest
Yes all 13 minutes of it. No mention of abortion.
C
Cathoholic
Guest
Well now is your chance to post on the OP.Cathoholic:
Yes all 13 minutes of it. No mention of abortion.
B
billsherman
Guest
You understanding is incorrect. Several of the cases have been heard on the merits. They have all been rejected as well.
In particular the PA cases (the one brought by the US Rep and the one brought by the campaign), at least two of the GA cases (the one brought by the campaign was rejected in a 3-0 decision - on the merits - by an extremely conservative panel), and most recently the WI brought by the campaign.
M
mojoalthor
Guest
Last edited:
C
Cathoholic
Guest
I want to invite you to post on the OP mojoalthor.
Hey! Welcome to Catholic Answers Forums!
Hey! Welcome to Catholic Answers Forums!
R
RolandThompsonGunner
Guest
It’s almost a tick at this point.
C
Cathoholic
Guest
An “unwillingness to engage with the evidence” has been shown as the OP video states.
See about 5:00 into video.
Last edited:
M
mojoalthor
Guest
Thank you. It is actually Mojo Al’Thor for the sci-fi/fantasy readers.
It has been addressed by a lawsuit filed.
Voting machine company executive sues Trump allies for defamation - In The News / World News - Catholic Answers Forums
C
Cathoholic
Guest
An “unwillingness to engage with the evidence” has been shown as the OP video states.
See about 5:00 into video.
See about 5:00 into video.
M
mojoalthor
Guest
I have sent the video link to Eric Croomer and his attorneys so they can investigate and decided whether or not to add Voris & The Vortex to the list of defendents.
Thanks for the OP.
B
billsherman
Guest
Several courts, including federal Circuit Courts of Appeal have reviewed the evidence. They have rejected it.
In most of these cases - it is very important to note - the campaign HAS NOT alleged fraud of any kind.
Take the WI case, for example. According to the federal judge (appointed by Trump!) who ruled against him:
"While Trump’s arguments about the conduct of the election weren’t frivolous, “when they are cleared of their rhetoric, they consist of little more than ordinary disputes over statutory construction,” the judge wrote in a 23-page order. “Plaintiff’s Electors Clause claims fail as a matter of law and fact.”
Emphasis mine. He reviewed all the evidence presented, and found that it fails “as a matter of law and fact.”
C
Cathoholic
Guest
I have explained that before too.
It is impossible to discriminate the votes when they are all thrown in and counted without making sure they are eligible and HOW MANY are eligible BEFORE the count.
I have been warning about this here on CAF for moths before the elections as this was being set up.
The foreign computers should never have been used and these should be disqualified too.
Last edited:
B
billsherman
Guest
I don’t really know what this means. Now you think Trump shouldn’t have filed lawsuits post-election?
He tried to stop people from voting via mail before the election. He failed at that too.
The problem with backing a showman is that they are usually all flash and no substance.
P
PaulinVA
Guest
They have to have been assembled in the US.
P
ProVobis
Guest
Okay, you got a week.
- Status