The incomplete and myopic personal view is your ‘opinion’ only. I am not the only person to have the view I have. People read our posts and can see when quotes used apply to the points or not.
I think it best we end our discussion. I am not the topic of the discussion, or the other discussions where we have disagreed.
As a matter of consistent reasoning you cannot cite the relevance of your personal opinion and then claim personal anonymity on the matter when taken to task.
To make this less personal and reduce the risk of animosity I will address your “positions” rather than you exclusively as a person of faith; Because I cannot claim God’s exclusive right and ability to pass judgement on your heart or it’s motives. So I won’t. And please forgive me if I have.
Would that be agreeable?
If so:
Your position(s) have taken on ever-changing locations as if they are a mobile goalpost.
When presented with the Gospel justification (
and command no less) to engage in Fraternal Correction to:
“… remove the wooden beam from your eye first; then you will see clearly to remove the splinter from your brother’s eye.” - Matthew 7:5
Your position states that the beginning of that passage prohibits judgements exclusively:
“Stop judging,* that you may not be judged." - Matthew 7:1
HOWEVER, you will note the * note as copied from the USCCB Bible. And here is what that * note states:
“* [7:1] This is not a prohibition against recognizing the faults of others, which would be hardly compatible with Mt 7:5, but against passing judgment in a spirit of arrogance, forgetful of one’s own faults.”]
And what is Mt 7:5?
Why, the very line I originally referenced!
“… remove the wooden beam from your eye first; then you will see clearly to remove the splinter from your brother’s eye.” - Matthew 7:5
So, obviously:
The OFFICIAL CATHOLIC understanding of this passage is NOT a prohibition against judgements, but rather a prohibition against hypocritical judgements as well as a command for humble fraternal judgements.
This is accurate. No?
When presented with the moral justification of Fraternal Correction from the Summa Theologica - your position is quickly redefined to the exclusive definition toward “bothers only” at the exclusion of our “enemies”.
HOWEVER when your position is reminded of the Scriptural/Theological precept that
our “enemies” ARE IN FACT our “brothers” (specifically by) Our Lord’s entry into the enemy area of Samaria and His Fraternal Correction of the Samaritan Woman at The Well over her many divorces, your position then resorts to:
“Let’s drop this because it’s becoming too personal.”
But this is a teachable moment for all of us. And there is so much more Scriptural Truth one could mine from this discussion on Fraternal Correction.
We haven’t even scratched the surface of St. Paul’s use of this charitable precept and command with his Gentile “brothers and sisters” who were formerly his pagan “enemies”.
In fact Paul considers fraternal correction as the best way to bring back someone (brother or enemy) who has strayed from the path:
**
“If anyone refuses to obey what we say in this letter (…) do not look on him as an enemy, but warn him as a brother.” - 2 Thessalonians 3:14-15; / Galatians 6:1.
**
And we haven’t even delved into the incomparable wisdom of St. Augustine who:
warns against the grave fault entailed in omitting to offer this help to one’s neighbor: “You do worse by keeping silent than he does by sinning.” - St. Augustine (Sermon 82, 7)
So I would humbly ask you to put aside your pride, and listen (not to me) but to the same Wisdom I have painfully come to hear as well: The Truth in it’s fullness from our timeless Catholic faith.
