FightingFat:
Sorry!
I think they would need to study the Catachism and reach their own conclusions about what it says and why it says it.?
Isn’t that relativism? I thought the idea of Church doctrine is that we don’t decide what it says but accept what it says. I think it’s pretty clear how homosexual ACTS are seen through the lens of either Christianity or Judaism. They are not affirmed.
FightingFat:
“[homosexualitys] physcological genesis remains largely unexplained” that it constitutes a trial for most of them, that “every sign of unjust discrimination in their regard should be avoided”…I think that sin is a matter of grace between the sinner and the priest and God and not for me to pass judgement on, unless my opinion is consulted.
And I agree that this SHOULD be an issue between a person and God. If homosexuals were content to engaged in their ‘gravely disordered condition’ without involving greater society I would have absolutely nothing to say on the subject. That they are trying to CHANGE the rest of us to suit THEIR desires and disordered thinking is the issue. What happens in someone’s bedroom is between them and their partner and God. I really do not think I should be involved in other people’s private lives. What I DO care about is the attempt to normalize and equalize homosexual pairings with heterosexual married couples. They want to get “married” they want to borrow, breed or buy children and bring the children up to think that homosexuality is normal.
The public issue is what concerns me. If someone wants to have sex with a dead deer in the woods, well that’s their choice. But were these same people to want this behavior to be recognized, supported and approved is a completely different kettle of fish…albeit just as smelly.
Do you understand the difference?
FightingFat:
I see a homosexual couple as being perfectly capable of love, of genuinely caring for one another. They must reconcile that with their faith and I see that they will need m love and support in coming to terms with stuff like that- which is going to be very tough.?
Look I have NO DOUBT that homoesexuals are every bit as capable of love as any of the rest of us. I know homosexual partners who deeply care for each other. I have several homosexual friends whom I adore and I know that the feeling is mutual. It is not a question of whether they can love, but whether that love is to be recognized on par with heterosexual married love. I have female friends that I love very much but we have no sexual feelings for each other. It’s not a matter of two people of the same sex deeply caring about each other, it’s a matter of the sexual aspects of same sex partnerships being questionable.
And sure I know it’s tough to push back these strong desires and like any other ‘addiction’ homosexuality is very hard to cure. But you are never going to cure or prevent a problem unless you acknowledge it IS a problem. There is NOTHING healthy about homosexual activity. Whether or not you believe in God, the reality is that our body parts are made for specific functions and using them otherwise tends to create problems. I can use my fist as a hammer but it’s neither a good hammer nor painfree as a practice.
FightingFat:
It’s just how I feel.
“homosexual apologists”
Heh-heh.
I suppose I don’t feel the need to show them what terrible sinners they are. I have enough sin of my own to deal with. I’m not denying how difficult some of these situations are…Openly condoning stuff is different from not condemning it. Still, I don’t feel outrage serves much useful purpose.
…If you believe you have been born homosexual, where do you go once you have come to terms with your sexuality? Are we saying that they should never come to terms with it?
I don’t see a lot of outrage regarding private acts between adult homosexuals (pedastry and pedophelia are different of course). Where I DO see outrage is in the homosexual activists’ demands that we accept, condone, even celebrate disordered thinking and actions. I do not see a reason to march in a parade to say you engage in sodomy and darned proud of it. I don’t see the rationale of demanding that homosexuals be allowed to be Boy Scout masters. I don’t want to see homosexuals (or heterosexuals) engaged in public displays of sexual affection. I do not see the reason that homosexuals should be ‘married.’ A registered partnership to protect both parties’ finances, access to each other, etc is fine. But that’s not what activists want. They want church weddings with champagne toasts and a passionate kiss at the end of the ceremony.
IOW my main objection is the PUBLIC activism. What these folks do in the bedroom is between them and God.
Lisa N