Is Darwin's Theory Of Evolution True? Part Two

  • Thread starter Thread starter Techno2000
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Supposedly, humans as well. Are their genetic similarities between various creatures? Sure. But, for land-dwelling creatures, the ability to function in one earth gravity, breathe our air, and effectively interact with their surrounding environment has to be there. You can’t just guess.
 
edwest211 said:
for land-dwelling creatures, the ability to function in one earth gravity, breathe our air, and effectively interact with their surrounding environment has to be there.
Click to expand...
Could natural selection leave us with anything else? No. Could you provide a better example of the reasonableness if natural selection? No.
 
Aloysium said:
We see different kinds of animals. The Serengeti, is one big niche that fits all sorts of creatures.
Click to expand...
This is incorrect. There are many ecological niches in the Serengeti. Some animals live in trees. Some in the ground. Even among animals that live in the same general space, some specialize in drinking nectar from flowers while others specialize in eating seeds. Since these two groups do not compete for the same food source, they can each evolve independently according to the type of life that creature inhabits. Even among animals that eat the same food, they often do not compete, so each can evolve differently based on other random choices an animal may have made long ago. Basically you argument still boils down to “I can’t imagine how this could be.” Your lack of imagination is not a scientific argument.
 
rossum said:
40.png
Techno2000:
You have to WANT to believe.
Click to expand...
Want? No, that is salvation by works. God has to WANT you to believe. 😀

rossum
Click to expand...
I can see this is going to Part Three 🤣
 
The first cell had to have function built in to survive. It had to able to process energy, chemicals or whatever to survive. It apparently did not just sit there and do nothing more. The ability to reproduce itself, including its internal machinery, involved yet another process that had to be there in the first place.
 
This thread is like an orgy of scientifically illiterate people stroking each others egos, with an occasional glimpse of intelligence and rationality injected into the madness.

It’s pretty embarrasing.
 
Last edited:
Evolution was just making things up as it went along? Any explanation is a good explanation even if it can’t be verified?
 
Spyridon said:
This thread is like an orgy of scientifically illiterate people stroking each others egos, with an occasional glimpse of intelligence and rationality injected into the madness.

It’s pretty embarrasing.
Click to expand...
Wait until part three comes out, it’s going to be even crazier :crazy_face:

 
Last edited:
What has that got to do with science? Science is a god to too many. The only source of knowledge. Faith? Not scientific.

I am amazed at the science journals that include very little information that is not biased. Science will eventually fill in all gaps, and we’ll stop dealing with that Bronze-age stuff.
 
Techno2000 said:
40.png
LeafByNiggle:
some specialize in drinking nectar from flower
Click to expand...
How did flower random mutations know there would be a specialized animal that would come along and utilize its nectar ?
Click to expand...
Frankly I am quite tired of your endless questions of how could this be and how could that be. I think you have asked at least 100 such questions in this thread and those questions have been patiently answered by myself or rossum or rau or timothyvail. But instead of saying thank you and “I see now” you go right on asking more questions of the very same sort. It appears more and more that you do not really want an answer. So I will respect your wishes and not give you one.
 
Last edited:
LeafByNiggle said:
40.png
Techno2000:
40.png
LeafByNiggle:
some specialize in drinking nectar from flower
Click to expand...
How did flower random mutations know there would be a specialized animal that would come along and utilize its nectar ?
Click to expand...
Frankly I am quite tired of your endless questions of how could this be and how could that be. I think you have asked at least 100 such questions in this thread and those questions have been patiently answered by myself or rossum or rau or timothyvail. But instead of saying thank you and “I see now” you go right on asking more questions of the very same sort. It appears more and more that you do not really want an answer. So I will respect your wishes and not give you one.
Click to expand...
Because the answers are too vague for me.
 
The Trump topic is well over 2000 posts without any signs of being closed so I think the limit must have been changed or dropped.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top