F
Feanor2
Guest
That’s sad. . .He did win.
That’s sad. . .He did win.
You don’t have to sell me. If our connections can be made secure enough to transfer billions of dollars daily, then certainly we can vote online with complete assurance.We put men on the moon 50 years ago and yet have not learned how to run honest elections with all the
technology we have today.
As long as you have Republicans have the last say through the Supreme Court, it will not be fair imo.No one will ever convince me that Joe Biden won the election in a fair contest.
That is why they were telling the people "it will look like Trump is the winner on election night, but just wait a few days and Biden will be the winner.
Al Gore won Florida in 2000 and most people went to bed.Yes, and then when Trump was winning by large numbers in the battleground states, everyone closes shop and goes home. Miraculously, the next morning
Biden takes the lead.
Our legal system is not just trials in court. It is a system for bringing opposing views together to find a shared resolution. It is lawyers negotiating settlements to avoid trials. And it is lawyers convincing their clients that there is no point to pursuing a lawsuit if there is no reason behind it.Has he won in court yet, to an extent to change the outcome? No?
Then what are you complaining about? If you think he is making a fool of himself, fine.
If they have no evidence, they will lose. That’s exactly how our system works.
And yet, they neglected to take the Senate.In your worldview, the Democrats are incredibly powerful and terrifyingly competent… pulling off the biggest act of corruption in the history of the planet on a scale no one has ever imagined while leaving no hard evidence behind.
So, loser pays.The suggested concept would allow access to the courts. Both the litigant and the lawyer should be penalized - for frivolous lawsuits.
There is this thing called discovery. Not until then does even the court know what it needs to know.Our legal system is not just trials in court. It is a system for bringing opposing views together to find a shared resolution. It is lawyers negotiating settlements to avoid trials. And it is lawyers convincing their clients that there is no point to pursuing a lawsuit if there is no reason behind it.
How do you know if there is evidence?Lawyers have abandoned Trump’s cause, but Trump has pushed on despite having no law and no evidence behind him.
It isn’t up to you whether he should continue to pursue the case. I suspect he doesn’t have enough evidence, and the focus would better spent winning the Georgia senate races. But thst isn’t my decision, either.He has found other lawyers to further his cause, instead of learning he should not be pursuing this cause.
Like I said, I’m in favor of loser pay in civil suits.Not exactly. Just because someone loses, it does not mean that the lawsuit was frivolous.