Muslim fury grows at Pope's speech

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jeffrey
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
im not mind reading or attempting to… im pretty much taking this from what you said. im simply doing 1+1 and guessing the answer is 2.
Please don’t guess and make assumptions, it is rude.

If you think that abandoning the mid east so that militant Islam can become stronger is somehow a solution to them taking over the world, I would like you to spell it out please?

Should we also abandon the horn of Africa to them as well?

What about Northern Africa?

What about Western Africa?

What about Eastern Europe?

What about SE Asia?

Just trying to find out where you draw the line.
 
im a believer in the wisdom of our founding fathers… “peace with all, entangling alliances with none” id rather throw in my lot with jefferson and washington than with people who believed that they could change the world through might like hitler, mao, stalin, alexander the great, trotsky and the french revolution to name a few
 
im a believer in the wisdom of our founding fathers… “peace with all, entangling alliances with none” id rather throw in my lot with jefferson and washington than with people who believed that they could change the world through might like hitler, mao, stalin, alexander the great, trotsky and the french revolution to name a few
Please answer my questions.

If you think that abandoning the mid east so that militant Islam can become stronger is somehow a solution to them taking over the world, I would like you to spell it out please?

Should we also abandon the horn of Africa to them as well?

What about Northern Africa?

What about Western Africa?

What about Eastern Europe?

What about SE Asia?

Just trying to find out where you draw the line.
 
im a believer in the wisdom of our founding fathers… “peace with all, entangling alliances with none” id rather throw in my lot with jefferson and washington than with people who believed that they could change the world through might like hitler, mao, stalin, alexander the great, trotsky and the french revolution to name a few
How can you use the founding fathers as an example here?

They were not facing this, nor could they concieve it I am sure.
 
I have known only five popes, Pius XII, John XXIII, Paul VI, John Paul I, John Paul II and now Benedict XVI. I don’t recall any being hated by the world. JPII was loved by the world. Stirring up hatred is not going to be productive of much positive.

I think Benedict XVI’s remarks were simply ill chosen and that the Vatican will be able to pour some oil on troubled waters here.
Pope Benedict is telling the TRUTH, quoteing historic fact!!! The truth is hard to take, especially if it exposes your own beliefs.
I Love JP2, but universally loved? He was the target of a muslim bullet. Pope Pios 12 has had hateful books written about him(books filled with lies).
Do you really believe Pope Benedicts speach was meant to “stir up hate”? I’ve read it, have you?
He has put the fat in the fire to some extent, and isn’t that what we are supposed to do? Or should we humbly turn our eyes from what is happening and close out mouths, and wait to be exterminated?
 
How can you use the founding fathers as an example here?

They were not facing this, nor could they concieve it I am sure.
doesn’t matter. washingtons farewell address contains universal truths that apply to any given time and situation. no nation is perfect, no lives can be made perfect and government is the last thing that can do that, but you wanna see a solution to many of our nation and worlds problems? look at that tiny, overlooked place smack in the middle of europe called switzerland. they have no standing army, just private militias. they have some of the lowest tax rates in the world, they have no welfare, no massive police surveilance programs, they have a gold standard free market economy, and they are neutral in foreign affairs.and guess what? they have no terrorist threats, no massive debt, no bloated buerocracy, no politicians claiming to have a solution to every problem, no govt stealing peoples weapons or hard earned money, no domestic or lobby groups. now THATS what i call a great nation.

after all, great things come in small packages right?
 
How can you use the founding fathers as an example here?

They were not facing this, nor could they concieve it I am sure.
Actually, the founding fathers of the US did face a part of this problem with the pirates coming out of Tripoli and sinking our shipping in the Mediterranean Sea. We fought them.

As for me, I am talking about what Chrysostom and the West needs to do, not necessarily what the US needs to do.
 
Actually, the founding fathers of the US did face a part of this problem with the pirates coming out of Tripoli and sinking our shipping in the Mediterranean Sea. We fought them.

As for me, I am talking about what Chrysostom and the West needs to do, not necessarily what the US needs to do.
ok fine. want a solution? heres what we can at least do in the meantime. pull out of the region and instead engage in equal diplomacy with all nations (do this not just in the middle east but the enire world) and dont favor any nation in that part of the world over others. dont do any arms sales. tell them that from now on the US will be a neutral albeit peaceful partner in foreign affairs. if you do this, the radicals will suddenly have a heart attack. why? because our unconditional support for israel, invasions of afghanistan and iraq are being used as successful propaganda by the extremists as proof that we are there to conquer and destroy them. but take away those tripwires, and suddenly the likes of bin laden and gang will realize that they no longer have any reason to rally supporters. of course you will have them trying to do overthrows of govts even after that, but as the last 20 years have shown the majority in the middle east favor moving forward and becoming modernised vs the backwards and archaic mentality of these nitwits. and as i said in another post that region is simply of a tribal mindset that will always be with them for the forseeable future. As far as religous dialogue, I’ll leave that up to the vatican to decide the best ways to deal with that
 
doesn’t matter. washingtons farewell address contains universal truths that apply to any given time and situation. no nation is perfect, no lives can be made perfect and government is the last thing that can do that, but you wanna see a solution to many of our nation and worlds problems? look at that tiny, overlooked place smack in the middle of europe called switzerland. they have no standing army, just private militias. they have some of the lowest tax rates in the world, they have no welfare, no massive police surveilance programs, they have a gold standard free market economy, and they are neutral in foreign affairs.and guess what? they have no terrorist threats, no massive debt, no bloated buerocracy, no politicians claiming to have a solution to every problem, no govt stealing peoples weapons or hard earned money, no domestic or lobby groups. now THATS what i call a great nation.

after all, great things come in small packages right?
Hey, Vatican City State has many of these qualities and is indeed smaller.

I still don’t see your point. Whatever. Maybe I see America a great nation in spite of your problems with her.
 
When you say pull out of the region, what are you talking about exactly. Do you mean:

Pull all troops out of Iraq today?

Pull all troops out of the region today?

Stop supporting all Mid East governments militarily, economically, etc?

Abandon all Mid East government treaties?

Pull all support from Israel?

Abandon all Israeli treaties?

And if we do all this what do you think Iran, Syria, and al-Qaeda will do? Come with hat in hand to the US to make peace?

I’m confused? We are off topic for this thread, but if you want to start a thread in the War on Terrorism forum I will follow it there.

This thread, I am pretty sure has to deal with Catholicism and what the Pope should do.
 
i barely see any problems with america… i have nothing but spite however for our government.

heres a guy who obviously didn’t quite learn that simple lesson:

“you cant love your country but hate your government at the same time”

-Bill Clinton
 
James,

By the way, you do know that what you are advocating is what OBL said was part of his strategy, right? Here are his objectives in the Mid East:

**Objective 1: **Expel American influence from Iraq and the Arabian Peninsula
**Objective 2: **Remove secular governments within the region
**Objective 3: **Eliminate Israel and purge Jewish and Christian influence
**Objective 4: **Expand the Muslim empire to historical significance

Let’s move the discussion to the War on Terrorism forum.
 
When you say pull out of the region, what are you talking about exactly. Do you mean:

Pull all troops out of Iraq today?

Pull all troops out of the region today?

Stop supporting all Mid East governments militarily, economically, etc?

Abandon all Mid East government treaties?

Pull all support from Israel?

Abandon all Israeli treaties?

And if we do all this what do you think Iran, Syria, and al-Qaeda will do? Come with hat in hand to the US to make peace?

I’m confused? We are off topic for this thread, but if you want to start a thread in the War on Terrorism forum I will follow it there.

This thread, I am pretty sure has to deal with Catholicism and what the Pope should do.
I dont see how im the one being off-topic if you keep asking me all these questions i gotta answer 😉

and to answer all the above questions…yes

i dont think we should give welfare support to ANY nation. and even a peace treaty is not always necessary between nations… we dont have any treaties with jamaica now do we? but i dont see either them or us threatening to kill each other. and dont worry about any nation in the middle east attempting to dominate the rest. we… the most powerful nation in the world… cant even handle iraq, what possibly makes you think someone like iran could even control the whole region?
 
James,

By the way, you do know that what you are advocating is what OBL said was part of his strategy, right? Here are his objectives in the Mid East:

**Objective 1: **Expel American influence from Iraq and the Arabian Peninsula
**Objective 2: **Remove secular governments within the region
**Objective 3: **Eliminate Israel and purge Jewish and Christian influence
**Objective 4: **Expand the Muslim empire to historical significance

Let’s move the discussion to the War on Terrorism forum.
let OBL live in his dream world… it aint gonna happen. it is just as concivable as hitler’s belief in a 1000 year reich. and that didnt exactly turn out according to plan now did it?
 
let OBL live in his dream world… it aint gonna happen. it is just as concivable as hitler’s belief in a 1000 year reich. and that didnt exactly turn out according to plan now did it?
Start a thread in the War on Terrorism forum and I will show you how it can happen.
 
A few words if i may. One thing about religous diplomacy is that, like that political and social diplomacy, it takes quite a few give and take. now regardless whether the extremists in islam are small or large, or whatever your opinion of the religon is is, the fact is both sides must accept the fact we gotta share this world together. obviously there are people on both sides who cant stand each others presense, but the last thing we need is for some party pooper on either side to allow us to react and rock the boat. remember that kid who in school would keep on poking you to get a reaction out of you? his whole idea was that you would. what we need to do is not to let the poking kid annoy us in these matters and find ways to make peace with each other (or at the very least make the situation tolerable) I think the pope mentioned this also in his speech. Of course we could always find ways of trying to make things better back, oh say 100 years ago, when there were very few problems at all between the jews, christians and muslims in the middle east, but thats a whole other topic.
James
I agree we have to live together. I have just read this thread and others about The Holy Father and the Islamic world and I have a few qoutes from the Bible.
Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God.
You have heard that it was said “You shall love your neighbour and hate your enemy” But I say to you, Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, so that you may be sons of your Father who is in heaven…For if you love those who love you, what reward have you?
Finally, something I want to say. Jesus was on the cross having suffered unbelievable pain and torment, and yet He still loves all of us no matter what we do. He loves ALL including the people who bomb and kill and hate whatever their religion or belief( or no belief). I don’t know about you but thinking about that makes me cry that God loves us that much. So, no matter what, we have to remember that we were ALL made in the image and likeness of Him.
Quite frankly I found the Popes speech difficult to understand (I have read it all) as I’m afraid intellectually I’m in the dim category. There were lots of difficult words I didn’t understand and philosophy which I find even harder at the level of the Holy Father.
 
being an intellectual and theologian, the current popes words wont exactly be street slang material for the rest of the world. expect his essays and writings to be very good but dont expect them to be easy to understand
 
James
IQuite frankly I found the Popes speech difficult to understand (I have read it all) as I’m afraid intellectually I’m in the dim category. There were lots of difficult words I didn’t understand and philosophy which I find even harder at the level of the Holy Father.
It was an academic speech gave to a group of theologians. The MM picked up one brief section, quoted it out of context and the rest is History.
 
It’s really hard to tell from your comments …are you talking about the actual speech Pope Benedict made at the University of Regensburg, or the parsed, taken out context re-edit being passed around by the mainstream media??? Sounds like the latter to me. In case you are interested in the one the Pope actually gave, it is available in complete format on the Vatican website, appearing soon at a computer near you complete with footnotes.

Finally, these parting words: God chose Benedict XVI to be His vicar. Benedict the XVI is His vicar.
Right, in these forums, it’s difficult to tell what a person is actually saying, so why not just read what I said? I was commenting on the Pope’s wisdom, in using such words in his lecture, and yes, I have read it in it’s context. It still doesn’t change the fact that he should know, that refering to a document from the 1400’s which describes Islam as inhumane, would set off a firestorm in the Muslim world.

Also, God did not chose Benedict as Pope, he left that up to the free will of the Cardinals. They could have chosen a incompentent Pope, as there have been such Pope’s in the past.

BTW, a nun was killed yesterday in Somalia, probably over the Pope’s words.

As I said before, as leader of the Catholic Church, his words have impact on Catholics world wide, including those living in hostile places. He has to be careful.

Peace
Jim
 
The Pope said that religion should not be used as an excuse for violence. How is that incendiary?
The Pope included in his lecture a document from the 1400’s, which describes Islam as inhumane. That’s what incendiary, regardless of whether you think it should be or not.

People can be killed and it looks as though a nun has, because of his words.

His careless use of words, doesn’t excuse Islamic violence, but the Pope himself is expressing regret over the situation. My guess is if he had to do it over, he would not have included that part of his lecture.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top