M
MaryT777
Guest
I’m just thankful nobody got shot on this Zimmerman watch.Who was the other man or woman who helped victims in the crash? Oh, we don’t even know. It’s an every day occurrence.
I’m just thankful nobody got shot on this Zimmerman watch.Who was the other man or woman who helped victims in the crash? Oh, we don’t even know. It’s an every day occurrence.
So why didn’t TM make it home? Why didn’t he call 911? Why didn’t he knock on anyone’s door?Good point. I personally believe he knew exactly where he was and went to follow Martin more. This suspect wasn’t getting away.
You’re an expert on civil litigation too? Goodness.No wonder the HOA had to settle a wrongful death suit with Martin’s parents.
How sad the errors of that night by Zimmerman.
No, I did not mean that someone who disagrees with me is uninformed. I tried to explain what I meant. Zimmerman cannot be tried for the same crime twice, he has already had his trial and been found not guilty. It is my understanding that in Florida, Zimmerman can’t be liable for civil damages since he has been found not guilty. Hate crime laws have been discussed, but the FBI has already investigated and found nothing to indicate racism. DOJ might try to come up with something and they might succeed or they might just be trying to placate those who don’t know about the limitations mentioned.Just because someone disagrees with you does not mean they are uniformed. Does it?..
Have you not heard about the scandal a day circus? Corruption definitely exists in the current regime, that is no conspiracy theory.…Corruption in the current regime sounds like another conspiracy theory.
Time to drag out the dead horse again.Good point. I personally believe he knew exactly where he was and went to follow Martin more. This suspect wasn’t getting away.
No wonder the HOA had to settle a wrongful death suit with Martin’s parents.
How sad the errors of that night by Zimmerman.
Not everyone acts like Martin.I’m just thankful nobody got shot on this Zimmerman watch.
A lot of time times the client isn’t even given the option. It’s the insurance company’s liability - they will handle it the way they feel is best for them.MaryT777,
You have already tried to use this a proof that Zimmerman did something wrong. Someone has already explained that the HOA didn’t HAVE to settle. They decided to settle. Many times insurance companies will settle rather than fight a law suit. This happens because it is cheaper to settle than to pay the lawyers to duke it out in court.
What’s this “we” stuff?We do not know for sure who was the attacker in this case.
he didn’t need a ride. he was within 100 yards of his dad’s girlfriend’s house.Good job for Zimmerman… Would it have been also nice if “Zimmerman offered Trayvon a ride home to get him out of the rain that night.” - Episcopal Bishop G Brewer -
He didn’t need a ride, he was outside, killing time or whatever. Aside from that at one point according to Jeantel he was in his father’s backyard. But what point are facts when you can gin up racial animosity and create headlineshe didn’t need a ride. he was within 100 yards of his dad’s girlfriend’s house.
exactly!! I like what bill o’reilly had to say the other night on his program. he was right on with what the real problem is.He didn’t need a ride, he was outside, killing time or whatever. Aside from that at one point according to Jeantel he was in his father’s backyard. But what point are facts when you can gin up racial animosity and create headlines
Lisa
Again we are back to your original stand. There is absolutely no evidence for your fantasy. What evidence there is supports Zimmerman’s story, which he told police before he had a lawyer, before he knew about any witness statements, and which he did not change upon being told that the encounter might have been videotaped: in fact, upon hearing this he replied Thank God!!!Good point. I personally believe he knew exactly where he was and went to follow Martin more. This suspect wasn’t getting away.
This is a common tactic for corporations: they look at the cost of settling and the cost of litigating, and pick the least expensive. Knowing how much more they might have to pay out if there were a guilty verdict, they worked towards a settlement.No wonder the HOA had to settle a wrongful death suit with Martin’s parents.
How sad the errors of that night by Zimmerman.
It’s solely the insurance company’s call for most policies. They are required to fulfill the terms of your policy with them. As a policyholder, in most situations, you have no authority at all on legal or settlement strategy.This is a common tactic for corporations: they look at the cost of settling and the cost of litigating, and pick the least expensive. Knowing how much more they might have to pay out if there were a guilty verdict, they worked towards a settlement.
In fact, in many of these cases, it is the insurance company’s call.
This is absolutely correct. In the insurance contract you subrogate your rights to make that decision… My doctors have malpractice insurance and they have very little influence over whether or not a case is fought or settled.It’s solely the insurance company’s call for most policies. They are required to fulfill the terms of your policy with them. As a policyholder, in most situations, you have no authority at all on legal or settlement strategy.
Was there evidence that proved Martin was casing the houses?Or he could have continued to case the houses in the complex.
Where I look at it as Martin’s demeanor and history seems to contribute to this tragedy.
Yes I agree with O’Reilly. What was funny was the next day he read a sample of responses and those who didn’t agree with him, instead of actually positing a different theory and supporting evidence simply called him names. WEAK WEAK WEAK thy name is the Leftexactly!! I like what bill o’reilly had to say the other night on his program. he was right on with what the real problem is.
He APPEARED to be casing the homes…no one can “prove” he was actually casing them although it later came out he was likely involved in a previous burglary.Was there evidence that proved Martin was casing the houses?
Lisa, you are already suspect to many (not only liberals) when you say you agree with Bill O’Reilly! LOL Admittedly though, even a broken clock tells the right time twice a day.Yes I agree with O’Reilly. What was funny was the next day he read a sample of responses and those who didn’t agree with him, instead of actually positing a different theory and supporting evidence simply called him names. WEAK WEAK WEAK thy name is the Left
If you don’t have evidence, call the person names or set up a straw man to knock down. It’s truly pathetic that their apparent lack of concern over hundreds of deaths of black youth at the hands of other black youth, of the high drop out rate, incarceration and unemployment of blacks, particularly young black males makes a mockery of their cries “Justice for Trayvon.”
Lisa
What does that mean: “likely” involved? Zimmerman was charged with domestic violence. Does the history of either of them have any legal bearing on the case?He APPEARED to be casing the homes…no one can “prove” he was actually casing them although it later came out he was likely involved in a previous burglary.
Lisa
Actually O’Reilly isn’t like Hannity who is what I call my Kool Aid guy. He is relatively candid and not afraid to be politically incorrect. Yes he is conservative but not a nut. This was with respect to a particular “Talking Points” regarding the real problems in the black community…and it’s aint a pudgy half Hispanic named George ZimmermanLisa, you are already suspect to many (not only liberals) when you say you agree with Bill O’Reilly! LOL Admittedly though, even a broken clock tells the right time twice a day.
No because neither were introduced during the trial. However, the point being that Martin’s behavior was suspicious in the context of recent burglaries in the neighborhood. That it was later revealed that Martin was found with ladies’ jewelry and burglary tools in his locker (hence his suspension) it simply adds to the credibility of Zimmerman who was probably more aware than the average citizen of what “casing” looks like.What does that mean: “likely” involved? Zimmerman was charged with domestic violence. Does the history of either of them have any legal bearing on the case?