Please explain differences in Masses

  • Thread starter Thread starter HistoryTeacher
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Abuse is possible at any Mass - TLM or NOM. We have all heard of or seen NOM’s filled with abuses. I have been at Indult TLMs with abuses as well.

Fringe groups and people you say? There are fringe groups and people at both the TLM and the NOM. They focus on what is wrong with the Church in their opinions. At the TLM they are characterized by those unable to see the Holy Father as anything but a traitor, who are extremely uncharitable towards fellow Catholics and Catholic clergy, and who place their own perspectives above that of the Church. At the NOM, they are characterized by those who somehow misconstrue Vatican II as a carte blanche to radical change in Catholic doctrine and practice. They see the Church as being prime territory for extreme social engineering.

Certainly there are problems in the Church. No reasonable Catholic can deny this. Reasonable, prudent, and orthodox Catholics should recognize these problems and work (and pray) to repair them. Insulting each other, deprecating certain Masses (TLM, NOM, etc.) is the work of Satan. Where there is division, there is the devil. Bickering amongst ourselves accomplishes nothing. Its time we respected each other’s liturgical preferences.

The NOM, like it or not, is the normative rite of Mass for Holy Mother Church. When done properly, it can be a beautiful sacrifice. Perhaps there are those who are fortunate enough to have a properly done NOM. I have been to many, many NOM parishes through the Archdiocese of Milwaukee, the Diocese of Green Bay, and the Diocese of Gary. I have yet to find a single NOM that is not afflicted by abuses.

The TLM can be abused as well. I’ve been to Indult TLMs fraught with abuses. Contrary to the opinions (or perhaps wishful thinking) of some, the TLM is growing in popularity. However, I sincerely doubt that the popularity of the TLM is nearly as widespread or massive as many Trads would like you to think.

In 2002 the Vatican established an Apostolic Administration for the Society of St. John Vianney in the diocese of Campos, Brazil. The S.S.J.V. was in a situation similar to that of the S.S.P.X. until they were regularized by Rome. They are led by Bishop Fernando Areas Rifan. The Apostolic Administration is essentially an independent diocese operating within the diocese of Campos and a couple of surrounding dioceses.

As far as traditional groups in communion with Rome, I can tell you that the F.S.S.P. and I.C.K. have ordained twenty new priests this year alone. Both have many seminarians in formation with plans to expand their seminaries. The Institute of Christ the King this year announced the formation of a traditional religious society for women. The Institute has two missions in Africa, three apostolates in Wisconsin, one in Rockford, Illinois, Cardinal George has recently invited the Institute to revitalize a defunct inner-city parish in Chicago, and Archbishop Burke has invited them to take over a parish in St. Louis.

The F.S.S.P. has two seminaries. One is in Wigratzbad, Germany, and the other in Denton, Nebraska. The Fraternity is present in more than 50 dioceses spread over 15 countries and four continents. The F.S.S.P. currently has nearly 170 priests and 120 seminarians in formation.

These numbers hardly suggest that the TLM is dying out.
 
Patrick2340-

I must compliment you on your post! Very well said!:clapping:
 
40.png
Patrick2340:
Abuse is possible at any Mass - TLM or NOM. We have all heard of or seen NOM’s filled with abuses. I have been at Indult TLMs with abuses as well. Fringe groups and people you say? There are fringe groups and people at both the TLM and the NOM. They focus on what is wrong with the Church in their opinions. At the TLM they are characterized by those unable to see the Holy Father as anything but a traitor, who are extremely uncharitable towards fellow Catholics and Catholic clergy, and who place their own perspectives above that of the Church. At the NOM, they are characterized by those who somehow misconstrue Vatican II as a carte blanche to radical change in Catholic doctrine and practice. They see the Church as being prime territory for extreme social engineering.

Certainly there are problems in the Church. No reasonable Catholic can deny this. Reasonable, prudent, and orthodox Catholics should recognize these problems and work (and pray) to repair them. Insulting each other, deprecating certain Masses (TLM, NOM, etc.) is the work of Satan. Where there is division, there is the devil. Bickering amongst ourselves accomplishes nothing. Its time we respected each other’s liturgical preferences.

The NOM, like it or not, is the normative rite of Mass for Holy Mother Church. When done properly, it can be a beautiful sacrifice. Perhaps there are those who are fortunate enough to have a properly done NOM. I have been to many, many NOM parishes through the Archdiocese of Milwaukee, the Diocese of Green Bay, and the Diocese of Gary. I have yet to find a single NOM that is not afflicted by abuses.

The TLM can be abused as well. I’ve been to Indult TLMs fraught with abuses. Contrary to the opinions (or perhaps wishful thinking) of some, the TLM is growing in popularity. However, I sincerely doubt that the popularity of the TLM is nearly as widespread or massive as many Trads would like you to think.

In 2002 the Vatican established an Apostolic Administration for the Society of St. John Vianney in the diocese of Campos, Brazil. The S.S.J.V. was in a situation similar to that of the S.S.P.X. until they were regularized by Rome. They are led by Bishop Fernando Areas Rifan. The Apostolic Administration is essentially an independent diocese operating within the diocese of Campos and a couple of surrounding dioceses.

As far as traditional groups in communion with Rome, I can tell you that the F.S.S.P. and I.C.K. have ordained twenty new priests this year alone. Both have many seminarians in formation with plans to expand their seminaries. The Institute of Christ the King this year announced the formation of a traditional religious society for women. The Institute has two missions in Africa, three apostolates in Wisconsin, one in Rockford, Illinois, Cardinal George has recently invited the Institute to revitalize a defunct inner-city parish in Chicago, and Archbishop Burke has invited them to take over a parish in St. Louis.

The F.S.S.P. has two seminaries. One is in Wigratzbad, Germany, and the other in Denton, Nebraska. The Fraternity is present in more than 50 dioceses spread over 15 countries and four continents. The F.S.S.P. currently has nearly 170 priests and 120 seminarians in formation.

These numbers hardly suggest that the TLM is dying out.
Very good posting. My point is that the tlm would be doing a whole lot better if those we associate with it were not so extreme and in many times just pain ignorant.

Do you think the FSSP (an excellent organization) would want to be associated with some of the “trads” (and their opinions) that are posted here? I think not.

When all is said and done, the growth of the tlm is tiny compared to that of the entire Latin Rite…
 
I didn’t think I was offensive or ignorant on any of the TLM threads.
But you kids need to learn to play nicely with each other.
I have yet to see any abuses in a TLM but I would think that as a group we are sticklers for perfection and the priest wouldn’t last if he tried to mess with the Mass. 😛
I did have a very old priest today who told me he has been saying to old Mass by himself because he was afraid. Is this what Vatican II has led to old men hiding out saying the Latin for themselves afraid to be booted for loving the Lord? He started to cry when I told him I went to the TLM at Holy Tinity.He said they took his Mass away. He is too old to make it in to Boston. He says Mass in the basement chepel when no one is around. I told him I would gladly join him if has said Mass after work. I don’t know if he will get in trouble for this but I don’t think this is really what Christ wanted. Instead of Romans hunting them down we have fellow Catholics. What a sad and tragic world we live in.
Kathy
 
40.png
Pandora:
I didn’t think I was offensive or ignorant on any of the TLM threads.
But you kids need to learn to play nicely with each other.
I have yet to see any abuses in a TLM but I would think that as a group we are sticklers for perfection and the priest wouldn’t last if he tried to mess with the Mass. 😛
I did have a very old priest today who told me he has been saying to old Mass by himself because he was afraid. Is this what Vatican II has led to old men hiding out saying the Latin for themselves afraid to be booted for loving the Lord? He started to cry when I told him I went to the TLM at Holy Tinity.He said they took his Mass away. He is too old to make it in to Boston. He says Mass in the basement chepel when no one is around. I told him I would gladly join him if has said Mass after work. I don’t know if he will get in trouble for this but I don’t think this is really what Christ wanted. Instead of Romans hunting them down we have fellow Catholics. What a sad and tragic world we live in.
Kathy
That is sad…the indult should be generously given, as long as it is not used as a forum to disparge the Mass of Paul VI. I’m sick to death of reading the postings of people who attack the Pauline Mass. It’s one thing to attack abuses, it’s another to be arrogant and say that the TLM Mass is more reverent (if a person would even qualify it with “in my opinion,” it would make a world of difference!). With deep reverence to the elderly priest you mention, the Mass is not “his Mass,” any more than it is “my Mass.” Liturgical warfare might cease if everyone remembered that…I firmly believe the abuses would stop if every celebrant, every liturgist, everybody would remember that it isn’t “MY Mass!”
 
40.png
Pandora:
I didn’t think I was offensive or ignorant on any of the TLM threads.
But you kids need to learn to play nicely with each other.
I have yet to see any abuses in a TLM but I would think that as a group we are sticklers for perfection and the priest wouldn’t last if he tried to mess with the Mass. 😛
I did have a very old priest today who told me he has been saying to old Mass by himself because he was afraid. Is this what Vatican II has led to old men hiding out saying the Latin for themselves afraid to be booted for loving the Lord? He started to cry when I told him I went to the TLM at Holy Tinity.He said they took his Mass away. He is too old to make it in to Boston. He says Mass in the basement chepel when no one is around. I told him I would gladly join him if has said Mass after work. I don’t know if he will get in trouble for this but I don’t think this is really what Christ wanted. Instead of Romans hunting them down we have fellow Catholics. What a sad and tragic world we live in.
Kathy
Then you lack exposure to a representative sample of tlm’s, making the rest of your comments suspect – for other obvious reasons as well.
 
40.png
AmyS:
Why the exception? Have you been to every NO church in the world? Quit generalizing…
Well how many churches in Detroit, I mean the world have 100 altar boys, and only altar boys? Not many…
 
40.png
Franciscum:
Postings like your’s are a prime reason why some people view the tlm with caution.

Sadly, the tlm often draws fringe groups and individuals. People who focus on what is wrong with the Church and not what is right with the Church. I refer to them as the “bitter bunker-mentality bunch.”

I personally enjoy attending the tlm on a regular basis, but I consciencely avoid the chat sessions before and afterwards that focus not on their love of Christ, but their hatred and disdain of “Mahony.”

I have read where more than one parish is dropping their tlm because of low attendance, not because of the other excuses (secret vendettas, etc.) some of the extreme crowd tries to sell.

No, I don’t believe it’s the tlm that’s keeping people away. It’s the regulars who are such a turn-off that are keeping peeople away.

Touting the benefits of head-coverings for women and the believed panacea effects of the tlm will never be a substitute for loving Christ and that shows in so many situations…
You are the one who is mentioning focusing on the love of Christ, but you are the one who hopes the Traditional Tridentine Latin Mass will die. Irony, eh?
Talking about fringe groups at the NO Mass, have you heard of Medjugorje lovers? Who will go against the Pope, becuase they believe that the Virgin Mary is trulyshowing herself at Medjugorje? Or what about the Charismatic-Lifeteen people whose Mass resembles Pentecostal/Protestant “worship sessions”? Or what about the thousands of Catholics at New Masses everywhere who use contraceptive or view no evil in it? There are alot more…

Sadly, who has allowed Catholics to fall into these errors? Have the bishops defended their flocks from errors? No, most bishops have not. Gow many souls are in hell or will be going to hell because priests and bishops haven’t taught the Faith? How come some priests have focused on the "love’[Divine Love is bvetter term] of Christ, which has caused their faithful to believe that being Faithful to the Church is not needed, because Christ is “100% LOVE”. Bishops should know of their errors. Didn’t Eusebius reprimand the Archbishop of COnstantnople at Mass for his Nestorian errors? Yes he did and Eusebius was a mere layman. Priests need to be told what’s what some times.
 
40.png
Franciscum:
Then you lack exposure to a representative sample of tlm’s, making the rest of your comments suspect – for other obvious reasons as well.
Judge not lest ye be judged
 
40.png
katolik:
You are the one who is mentioning focusing on the love of Christ, but you are the one who hopes the Traditional Tridentine Latin Mass will die. Irony, eh?
Talking about fringe groups at the NO Mass, have you heard of Medjugorje lovers? Who will go against the Pope, becuase they believe that the Virgin Mary is trulyshowing herself at Medjugorje? Or what about the Charismatic-Lifeteen people whose Mass resembles Pentecostal/Protestant “worship sessions”? Or what about the thousands of Catholics at New Masses everywhere who use contraceptive or view no evil in it? There are alot more…

Sadly, who has allowed Catholics to fall into these errors? Have the bishops defended their flocks from errors? No, most bishops have not. Gow many souls are in hell or will be going to hell because priests and bishops haven’t taught the Faith? How come some priests have focused on the "love’[Divine Love is bvetter term] of Christ, which has caused their faithful to believe that being Faithful to the Church is not needed, because Christ is “100% LOVE”. Bishops should know of their errors. Didn’t Eusebius reprimand the Archbishop of COnstantnople at Mass for his Nestorian errors? Yes he did and Eusebius was a mere layman. Priests need to be told what’s what some times.
Please do not lie.

You seem to think you build an argument based on an outright lie? Think again.
 
I’m sick to death of reading the postings of people who attack the Pauline Mass.
Get use to it, more to come. There is an uprising of the Post-Vatican II Children which is happing inside the Church. We want the old Mass back and we will stop at NOTHING to get it. It is only going to get worse until those old Vatican II Bishops die off.
 
40.png
OrthoCath:
Get use to it, more to come. There is an uprising of the Post-Vatican II Children which is happing inside the Church. We want the old Mass back and we will stop at NOTHING to get it. It is only going to get worse until those old Vatican II Bishops die off.
That uprising: that would make them Protestants, wouldn’t it? Esp. if they "stop at nothing to get it?" Orthodox Catholics (I take it that you aspire to being thought of as orthodox) don’t rise up against the legitimate authority of the Church. Schismatics do, though. Do you wish to replace the Pauline Mass with the TLM? I don’t think the Pauline Mass is going to be going anywhere, otherwise they wouldn’t be working on those translations. I’ve always believed that the Indult should be generously applied. If the shoe were on the other foot, could I count on an indult for the Mass of Paul VI from people like you? Lots of us don’t want to go back to not being able to understand the priest, having Mass mumbled, the astonishing sight of people saying the Rosary during Mass when they should be focused on the Sacrifice.
 
40.png
Patrick2340:
Abuse is possible at any Mass - TLM or NOM. We have all heard of or seen NOM’s filled with abuses. I have been at Indult TLMs with abuses as well.

Fringe groups and people you say? There are fringe groups and people at both the TLM and the NOM. They focus on what is wrong with the Church in their opinions. At the TLM they are characterized by those unable to see the Holy Father as anything but a traitor, who are extremely uncharitable towards fellow Catholics and Catholic clergy, and who place their own perspectives above that of the Church. At the NOM, they are characterized by those who somehow misconstrue Vatican II as a carte blanche to radical change in Catholic doctrine and practice. They see the Church as being prime territory for extreme social engineering.

Certainly there are problems in the Church. No reasonable Catholic can deny this. Reasonable, prudent, and orthodox Catholics should recognize these problems and work (and pray) to repair them. Insulting each other, deprecating certain Masses (TLM, NOM, etc.) is the work of Satan. Where there is division, there is the devil. Bickering amongst ourselves accomplishes nothing. Its time we respected each other’s liturgical preferences.

The NOM, like it or not, is the normative rite of Mass for Holy Mother Church. When done properly, it can be a beautiful sacrifice. Perhaps there are those who are fortunate enough to have a properly done NOM. I have been to many, many NOM parishes through the Archdiocese of Milwaukee, the Diocese of Green Bay, and the Diocese of Gary. I have yet to find a single NOM that is not afflicted by abuses.

The TLM can be abused as well. I’ve been to Indult TLMs fraught with abuses. Contrary to the opinions (or perhaps wishful thinking) of some, the TLM is growing in popularity. However, I sincerely doubt that the popularity of the TLM is nearly as widespread or massive as many Trads would like you to think.

In 2002 the Vatican established an Apostolic Administration for the Society of St. John Vianney in the diocese of Campos, Brazil. The S.S.J.V. was in a situation similar to that of the S.S.P.X. until they were regularized by Rome. They are led by Bishop Fernando Areas Rifan. The Apostolic Administration is essentially an independent diocese operating within the diocese of Campos and a couple of surrounding dioceses.

As far as traditional groups in communion with Rome, I can tell you that the F.S.S.P. and I.C.K. have ordained twenty new priests this year alone. Both have many seminarians in formation with plans to expand their seminaries. The Institute of Christ the King this year announced the formation of a traditional religious society for women. The Institute has two missions in Africa, three apostolates in Wisconsin, one in Rockford, Illinois, Cardinal George has recently invited the Institute to revitalize a defunct inner-city parish in Chicago, and Archbishop Burke has invited them to take over a parish in St. Louis.

The F.S.S.P. has two seminaries. One is in Wigratzbad, Germany, and the other in Denton, Nebraska. The Fraternity is present in more than 50 dioceses spread over 15 countries and four continents. The F.S.S.P. currently has nearly 170 priests and 120 seminarians in formation.

These numbers hardly suggest that the TLM is dying out.
Thank you… that was a great post… It makes me think of the approaches the demons would make in “Screwtape Diarys” Satan loves bickering…
 
don’t rise up against the legitimate authority of the Church
Why do we have to go against the “legitimate” authority? The indult is allowed. Wherever it is allowed there are families with LOTS of children who attend. If you do the Math in the long run the Traditional Catholics will out number the Novus Ordo Catholics. We have plenty of time to wait and we are happy with our Churches. Which by the way are NOT mostly attendend by the Pre-Vatican II bunch.

See that is the problem with the New Order you can’t be happy allowing us to practice the Traditional faith. You have to always surpress us because you are affraid that vocations with will out number you and people will prefer the TLM. It’s crazy! If you are truly Catholic then you would embrace us because, “if we were wrong then, then we are wrong now.”

BTW, Traditional Vocations are Flurishing.
 
Franciscum in #12:
It’s too bad the indult for the Tridentine Mass wasn’t immediate, for it may well have died out on its own had that been the case…
Franciscum in #70:
Please do not lie.

You seem to think you build an argument based on an outright lie? Think again.
First it is “too bad” that the Tridentine Mass has not yet died out and then you call the one who points out that you hope the Tridentine Mass will die out a liar. Which of your two statements would you now care to retract?

James
 
40.png
JKirkLVNV:
Lots of us don’t want to go back to not being able to understand the priest, having Mass mumbled, the astonishing sight of people saying the Rosary during Mass when they should be focused on the Sacrifice.
Those are all old wives’ tales.[Nothing against Catholic wives]

Also you contradict yourself. One should focus on the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass,right and not say the ROsary at Mass…Well on the other jand if you are truly consentrating on the Sacrifice of the Mass you wouldn’t care how the priest’s voice sounded.
 
40.png
OrthoCath:
Get use to it, more to come. There is an uprising of the Post-Vatican II Children which is happing inside the Church. We want the old Mass back and we will stop at NOTHING to get it. It is only going to get worse until those old Vatican II Bishops die off.
And this says it all!
 
40.png
James0235:
First it is “too bad” that the Tridentine Mass has not yet died out and then you call the one who points out that you hope the Tridentine Mass will die out a liar. Which of your two statements would you now care to retract?

James
You need to take a class in critical thinking. I truly wish the Tridentine indult would have been available immediately at the prommulgation of the Novus Ordo Mass.

It certainly wouldn’t be such a devisive wedge in the Church today if the indult had been readily available, and yes, it may very well have died from non-use because much of the intrigue surrounding the Tridentine wouldn’t exist.
 
40.png
katolik:
Those are all old wives’ tales.[Nothing against Catholic wives]

As an old Catholic wife, I can tell you this is exactly what was the case commonly at Mass before the liturgical renewal.
 
40.png
OrthoCath:
Why do we have to go against the “legitimate” authority? The indult is allowed. Wherever it is allowed there are families with LOTS of children who attend. If you do the Math in the long run the Traditional Catholics will out number the Novus Ordo Catholics. We have plenty of time to wait and we are happy with our Churches. Which by the way are NOT mostly attendend by the Pre-Vatican II bunch.

See that is the problem with the New Order you can’t be happy allowing us to practice the Traditional faith. You have to always surpress us because you are affraid that vocations with will out number you and people will prefer the TLM. It’s crazy! If you are truly Catholic then you would embrace us because, “if we were wrong then, then we are wrong now.”

BTW, Traditional Vocations are Flurishing.
It’s up to the cognizant bishop whether or not to allow the indult – hence the wish of a “universal indult” that would be up to individual celebrants of the Mass.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top