A
Annie
Guest
way to raise rents and have people “rent up”She’ll pass her Rent Relief Act to provide a tax credit for people spending 30 percent or more of their income on rent and utilities.
way to raise rents and have people “rent up”She’ll pass her Rent Relief Act to provide a tax credit for people spending 30 percent or more of their income on rent and utilities.
Yes, you’re right. Thanks for the fact check.Did she say riots? Or did she say protests?
There’s a difference.
A few town’s over from where I live was a BLM protest that was peaceful. And various people came to counter protest “get out of my neighborhood”.
Actually she didn’t say riots.
*I know there are protests still happening in major cities across the United States, I’m just not seeing the reporting on it that I had for the first few weeks," Colbert said.
“That’s right,” Harris replied. “But they’re not gonna stop. They’re not gonna stop, and this is a movement, I’m telling you.”
There is nothing extremist here. She’s basically describing Canada and other social democratic states in Western Europe (e.g. Scandinavian countries, and even the UK under a Conservative government). The reproductive rights bit might be against Church teaching, but then most of the population isn’t Catholic. We can’t enforce reproductive rights on non-Catholics other than abortion, which transcends religious affiliation, but which most Western countries have alas ignored.Her presidential platform seems pretty extremist to me:
Whether one agrees or not that protests need to continue, peaceful demonstration is a fundamental right is it not?I disagree that the protests need to continue. I think what needs to happen is work–in schools, in homes, in towns and cities, and in churches.
I personally know people who were hurt by this policy. They bought homes, but were unprepared for home ownership. They had to file for bankruptcy, which is not pleasant.That was so insane that even I understood it was crazy. People were advertising mortgages at 125%, and since those who “sold” mortgages quickly bundled them up and resold them, there was a huge motivation to sell mortgages to anyone.
Bad, bad policy.
Define this.a minimum living wage for Americans,
My daughter was able to put herself through college with no help from me (I couldn’t afford it). She was accepted at the state university ($12,000/year) and at a Jesuit university here in town ($40,000.00) 2009 prices. She had to choose the state university. She finished in four years. Her first job right out of college paid over $100,000.00 per year STARTING PAY. That’s more than twice what I make, and I’m a graduate of that Jesuit university. No need to accrue inordinate debt.helping students whose families are not well off financially receive a higher education without accruing inordinate debt,
My son, on the other hand, flunked out of college twice. And he is extremely bright. He just wasn’t made for school. He is very happy working in the restaurant business. You don’t need to go to college to get a good job.I applaud your daughter’s drive and determination. I bet she gets it, in large part, from her mother. Not all students, however, are as driven or mature as your daughter is, or come from such good families. They may need a little more help to have the opportunity to achieve success.
You got that right. Universities get rich from government funds.Someone was getting richer from my debt, but it certainly wasn’t me.
And from alumni funds. I was appalled when I learned how much of McGill university’s alumni fund went to paying pensions (it’s my alma mater). I forget the amount now but it was at least 1/4.You got that right. Universities get rich from government funds.
The strange thing is, nobody is forced to go to college. Also, there are ways to earn money for college, including military service. The GI bill pays tuition and a living stipend for a 4-year public university. I told my kids that they can go to any college they can afford. My son used the GI bill and an academic scholarship to attend a private college, and graduated debt free.It’s not really giving free money to people, but rather not burdening them with debt.
In my case it was chemistry (B.Sc.). Worked for 20 years as an applied chemist/physicist in the paper industry before switching to health care IT for the rest of my career, with a brief interval in pharmaceuticals and forensics.My BIL completed his graduate studies there - linguistics. His thesis was “Word Order in Old English.” This prepared him for…teaching!
Mainly the disparity in costs across the country and the inefficiency of federal government in managing programs like this. I think there should be a public option, but it should be handled by the individual states and limited to residents of those states.What is so extreme or radical about universal health care for Americans
My main issue with this is that again, costs of living vary wildly across the country, so it should be handled on a state and local level.minimum living wage for Americans
Again, I’m flexible here, I wouldn’t have a problem with 2 years at a community college being treated like a public education option. But free 4 year degrees at expensive universities with questionable marketability is silly.helping students whose families are not well off financially receive a higher education without accruing inordinate debt
All new gun sales require a background check. Every single one.requiring universal background checks for gun ownership to protect society
I 100% support switching our electricity production to nuclear which releases no green house gasses. I don’t support the currently impractical solar and wind option.protecting our planet from the ravages of climate change which are now upon us
A pack of condoms is like $6.or giving women (many of whom are not Catholic) access to contraception to help them and their families?
Of course. But breaking the law (e.g., blocking a street–this happened several times this summer in our city, resulting in the arrest of the protesters–and they are STILL whining about that and trying to get the charges dismissed because they think it’s part of their "right to free speech), and terrorizing fellow citizens (by forming a linked-together line and taking up an entire street or sidewalk so that others cannot pass through or get out of the way) is NOT a fundamental right.Whether one agrees or not that protests need to continue, peaceful demonstration is a fundamental right is it not?