Putin, the Russian president, moves to ban gay marriage and add references to God in constitutional amendments

  • Thread starter Thread starter mdgspencer
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
EndTimes said:
40.png
niceatheist:
My copy of Churchills History of the Second World War, in the appendices, has a literal boat load of telegraphs and other correspondence.
Click to expand...
And my copy of the Three-Volume Set of the Complete Correspondence between Churchill and Roosevelt - which contains ALL of their Correspondences including that re: “Uncle Joe” (Stalin) - is “mint”… first issued in 1984 publishes their complete correspondence from October 1933 to April 1945, the month FDR died.

Were America not support Churchill from before its Entrance into WWII - Britain would have been very quickly demolished - and acquiesant to Hitler.

Were America not support the Soviet Union - All of Europe and parts of Asia and African would be speaking the hated-by some, German Language…
Click to expand...
The likelihood of an invasion of Britain was highest after the Fall of France, and the whole point of the German air campaign during the Battle of Britain was to soften the island’s defenses to make an invasion possible. Germany’s defeat at the Battle of Britain pretty much ended any direct threat of an invasion of the Britain itself. We know now that Germany never held any illusions after that that it could actually occupy Britain, and soon enough it had invaded Russia, and it put efforts in Western Europe into preventing a future invasion of Occupied Europe.

There are a whole lot iffs involved in what might have happened if Germany had not invaded Russia or the Americans had not began Lend-Lease or later entered the war. German strategists seemed to shift to isolating Britain, trying to sink as many North Atlantic convoys as they could, and basically isolate Britain; cutting it off from the rest of the Empire (Japan was taking care of that in the East). I suppose it’s possible, maybe even probable that eventually Britain might have sued for peace and recognized Germany’s control of Europe, but I think that would have required a wholesale change in the British government. Even Chamberlain had drawn his red line over the invasion of Poland, and anyone within the British establishment that was at all in favor of some sort of peace deal with the Germans was either discredited or kept their head down. If Britain had been left alone to face German hegemony over Europe, with its Empire in tatters and the Axis free to strip away Imperial holdings, I suppose in the long run it would have gone bankrupt and had to abandon even nominal resistance to German-occupied Europe.
 
Ah, the Beats or the Beatniks. Promoting sexual perversion. I saw a paperback from the late 1950s filled with Beat images. Turned my stomach.
 
niceatheist said:
Germany’s defeat at the Battle of Britain …
Click to expand...
Again … would never have occurred had not Roosevelt gave to Churchill what Churchill begged for…

Were America not support Churchill from before its Entrance into WWII - Britain would have been very quickly demolished - and acquiesant to Hitler.

Were America not support the Soviet Union - All of Europe and parts of Asia and African would be speaking the hated-by some, German Language…

As a student - you should absolutely check out that 3-Volume Set…

It details Exactly - what went down - to the numbers.

_
 
Last edited:
You see it clearly. The oppressed, in order to win, must oppress others - by law. They have become the oppressors. I am not for calling anyone names but the other side appears to have no problem with it. Very much an ‘eye for an eye’ approach. Instead of, you do what you want and we’ll do what we want. And by the way, stop calling us names. The fact is no one needs my permission or anyone else’s permission to live how they want. But force is being used here. People don’t like being forced.
 
Last edited:
Bebop? You missed Bop. But I recall that it did not go over. That from the Creators of New Words and Phrases to Give People the Illusion that Things Have Changed.

Jazz? I don’t mind the 1950s version but I would never collect it or listen to the new stuff.
 
Last edited:
Totally out, along with all the fake music brand names out there. I stopped listening to FM in the '90s. And the sludge they play today is… well, sludge.
 
That’s so beat… Not very imaginative are we?
My older bro met Jack Kerouac in Northport and went to a party and met Barbra Streisand. Yours?

For your penance, work diligently to ensure that homosexual never get replace with G.A.Y. - Kay?

Putin did a solid . Karl Marx was a Satanist. And Satan&Co shall to to Hell.
 
Last edited:
Please first answer my prior question

Are you Actually supporting Marx, Marxism and AntiChristian Militant Marxism?
 
Then…

Since I asked first. Neither shall I answer yours…

I had a very strong belief that you wouldn’t answer that question …
 
The Battle of Britain was won by Spitfires piloted by British and Imperial pilots. Lend-Lease wasn’t finalized until afterwards.
 
The claim is absurd. Marx was an atheist. He no more believed in Satan than he did in God. There’s plenty to criticize Marx over without meritless character assassinations.
 
Quite right. The larger point is that Churchill didn’t actively start sending military planners across the Pond to meet with American officials until after the Battle of Britain.

And there’s quite a bit of dispute among military historians as to whether there was ever a real threat of an invasion of Britain. Certainly the threat was seen as a possibility in Britain at the time, but it is pretty questionable that Germany had the resources needed to take on the even-then formidably well defended British coastline. I find it doubtful that the German military planners were all that dedicated to such a plan, considering the vast costs in manpower and resources that a successful invasion would require, and the even greater costs of actually occupying any significant part of the Isle of Britain. I don’t think Hitler thought Churchill’s declaration that the British would defend their island was an idle boast. At any rate, Hitler felt he had bigger fish to fry after the Fall of France, and turned his tender mercies towards Russia.
 
I can well imagine a Pope saying something along the lines that Communism was somehow inspired by Satan, but calling Marx, a rather proud (perhaps the first proud) atheist a Satanist crosses over into the absurd. Marx’s ideal society would have been one with no religious beliefs, not one where images of Christ, Mary and the Saints were stripped from St. Peters and replaced with Satanic icons. It’s a ludicrous claim.
 
The political left loved Russia when they were atheistic, communistic and globalistic. When Russia was a blood thirsty dictatorship hell bent on slaughtering tens of millions of its own citizens, the political left had nothing but good things to say about Russia.

But now that Russia is Christian and Nationalistic? Russia is the ultimate enemy to the political left, which tells you everything you need to know about the political left.
 
Aquinas11 said:
The political left loved Russia when they were atheistic, communistic and globalistic. When Russia was a blood thirsty dictatorship hell bent on slaughtering tens of millions of its own citizens, the political left had nothing but good things to say about Russia.

But now that Russia is Christian and Nationalistic? Russia is the ultimate enemy to the political left, which tells you everything you need to know about the political left.
Click to expand...
Which has precious little to do with anything. Russia is no model of an ideal state in my view. Putin is pushing to make himself President for Life, he’s had Russian citizens murdered both within Russia’s borders and outside them. The Russian Orthodox Church has itself simply switched allegiances. It was a tool of the Czars, and after the German invasion of Russia, Stalin partially rehabilitated the Church as a propaganda tool, and then the Church simply switched sides to the post-Soviet Russian government.

I mean no disrespect to Russian Christians, but let’s be pretty blunt here, long ago the Muscovite Princes asserted their authority over the Russian Church, and indeed have since then at various times asserted their would-be authority over all of Eastern Orthodoxy. The Russian Orthodox Church has ever been the faithful servant of whomever happened to occupy the Kremlin, and has often benefited mightily from those last vestiges of the Eastern theory of Caesaro-Papism.

And need I add that neither the Russian Orthodox Church or the Kremlin are any friends to Catholicism.
 
Last edited:
Errr… That’s not only a pure failed Ad Hominem gambit which disproves Zero
I’ve contacted you and the Mods with much more supportive evidences…

Marx? AntiChristian to the Core!

_
 
niceatheist said:
Putin is pushing to make himself President for Life, he’s had Russian citizens murdered both within Russia’s borders and outside them.
Click to expand...
Apparently not enough or the Political Left would love him as they did when Stalin murdered tens of millions.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top