F
fix
Guest
![40.png](https://forums.catholic-questions.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/h/f05b48/40.png)
CINOWhich is precisely what Bishop Chaput meant when he said, many Catholics are in the pews on Sundays that don’t even realize they aren’t Catholic anymore.
CINOWhich is precisely what Bishop Chaput meant when he said, many Catholics are in the pews on Sundays that don’t even realize they aren’t Catholic anymore.
Let’s see what the contract stipulates. I’m not against her staying as long as she submits to the teachings of Church.Update on situation
http://www.savesister.com/
Looks like the students at St. John the Baptist school are still in for some more false teaching on homosexuality.
Do you really fear it?Yin,
I fear it is merely a matter of time before God rights His ship.
It is really sad. It would be one thing if some secular person with a poorly formed conscience maintained their feelings as truth, but when a sister who represents the Catholic Church and is in charge of children is so remarkably incorrect in matters of faith and morals one really has to look to the bishop and start asking what the heck is going on?If that so-called “Sister” gets a contract, then the faith just lost bigtime (nothing unusual, Catholics of 30 years ago would not recognize the faith today).
If the Sister’s renewed contract means she has seen the error of her ways, then yes there is good reason to celebrate.Update on situation
http://www.savesister.com/
Looks like the students at St. John the Baptist school are still in for some more false teaching on homosexuality.
Step down and a public rebuke from the bishop is in order.Lawyer Michael J. Sundstedt, who represented more than 30 parents who questioned the boys’ enrollment, said Vianney ought to step down immediately.
“It’s sad the nun is leaving, but I also think that it may be the best thing in the long run if she is impeding the teachings of the church,” he said.
Instead of praying for Brown’s intervention to save Vianney’s job, “this parish would be better served if they would have a prayer vigil in support of the teachings of the church,” Sundstedt said
I have a devotion to Our Lady of Akita.fix,
There are a ton of prophecies that speak about the time when people within the faith would step into apostacy. I think we are seeing that time.
Indeed, is this not happening as we speak?fix,
Here is a sobering excerpt from Our Lady’s statements at Akita:
"The work of the devil will infiltrate even into the Church in such a way that one will see cardinals opposing cardinals, bishops against other bishops. The priests who venerate me will be scorned and opposed by their confreres (other priests). Churches and altars will be sacked. The Church will be full of those who accept compromises and the demon will press many priests and consecrated souls to leave the service of the Lord."
Penny Plain. Johnny going down on Franky is as disgusting as sex involving blood and feces. Most people know this is disgusting abnormal behavior.The insinuation that gay men don’t engage in anal sex is false.Historically, the use of the nitrite inhala nts (amyl nitrite, butyl nitrite, isobutyl nitrite, etc.) for recreational purposes has been limited almost entirely to gay men.The first reports of recreational use date from the early 1960s, after the amyl nitrite prescription requirement was eliminated by the FDA. The drug appeared to intensify and prolong the sensation of orgasm. It facilitated anal intercourse, by relaxing the by relaxing the smooth sphincter muscles and deadening the sense of pain.(3)
**Abomination:banghead: **
Dear Thelka,What does that mean “present themselves as a couple?” They can’t both be there? They can’t stand next to one another? They can’t hold hands? They can’t make out in the back row? What does it mean?
This is not about the “cafeteria” but about the children. We have the children of gay couples at my school and no one pays much attention to them. This school has painted a sign on their foreheads and is now rubbing salt in the wound; they already know they are different. I just find this intolerance unacceptable and morally wrong.
From the Considerations Regarding…
It might be asked how a law can be contrary to the common good if it does not impose any particular kind of behaviour, but simply gives legal recognition to a* de facto* reality which does not seem to cause injustice to anyone. In this area, one needs first to reflect on the difference between homosexual behaviour as a private phenomenon and the same behaviour as a relationship in society, foreseen and approved by the law, to the point where it becomes one of the institutions in the legal structure. This second phenomenon is not only more serious, but also assumes a more wide-reaching and profound influence, and would result in changes to the entire organization of society, contrary to the common good. Civil laws are structuring principles of man’s life in society, for good or for ill. They “play a very important and sometimes decisive role in influencing patterns of thought and behaviour”.(14) Lifestyles and the underlying presuppositions these express not only externally shape the life of society, but also tend to modify the younger generation’s perception and evaluation of forms of behaviour. Legal recognition of homosexual unions would obscure certain basic moral values and cause a devaluation of the institution of marriage.
As experience has shown, the absence of sexual complementarity in these unions creates obstacles in the normal development of children who would be placed in the care of such persons. They would be deprived of the experience of either fatherhood or motherhood. Allowing children to be adopted by persons living in such unions would actually mean doing violence to these children, in the sense that their condition of dependency would be used to place them in an environment that is not conducive to their full human development. This is gravely immoral and in open contradiction to the principle, recognized also in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, that the best interests of the child, as the weaker and more vulnerable party, are to be the paramount consideration in every case