THE CAFETERIA IS CLOSED at St. John the Baptist School, Cost Mesa CA

  • Thread starter Thread starter catholicwife
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
HagiaSophia:
Which is precisely what Bishop Chaput meant when he said, many Catholics are in the pews on Sundays that don’t even realize they aren’t Catholic anymore.
CINO
 
If that so-called “Sister” gets a contract, then the faith just lost bigtime (nothing unusual, Catholics of 30 years ago would not recognize the faith today).
 
40.png
HumbleSinner:
Update on situation
http://www.savesister.com/

Looks like the students at St. John the Baptist school are still in for some more false teaching on homosexuality.
Let’s see what the contract stipulates. I’m not against her staying as long as she submits to the teachings of Church.
 
40.png
TPJCatholic:
Yin,

I fear it is merely a matter of time before God rights His ship.
Do you really fear it?

I don’t.
I would welcome it.
I might be nuts. :whacky:
But I think it’s really that I’m just so tired of the fight.
I will not lose faith, nor will I rest.
I remain in the fight and pray for endurance.
 
Yin,

Yes, I fear it because there are so many people, including many I know, who are not even close to ready. That is always the double edge problem with God’s justice on a orporate scale…
 
40.png
TPJCatholic:
If that so-called “Sister” gets a contract, then the faith just lost bigtime (nothing unusual, Catholics of 30 years ago would not recognize the faith today).
It is really sad. It would be one thing if some secular person with a poorly formed conscience maintained their feelings as truth, but when a sister who represents the Catholic Church and is in charge of children is so remarkably incorrect in matters of faith and morals one really has to look to the bishop and start asking what the heck is going on?
 
40.png
HumbleSinner:
Update on situation
http://www.savesister.com/

Looks like the students at St. John the Baptist school are still in for some more false teaching on homosexuality.
If the Sister’s renewed contract means she has seen the error of her ways, then yes there is good reason to celebrate.
Keep following the story…
I would be very, very, very disappointed if there weren’t specific stipulations to her contract.
The story also doesn’t address the requirement on the parents of the children.
 
fix,

There are a ton of prophecies that speak about the time when people within the faith would step into apostacy. I think we are seeing that time.
 
Lawyer Michael J. Sundstedt, who represented more than 30 parents who questioned the boys’ enrollment, said Vianney ought to step down immediately.

“It’s sad the nun is leaving, but I also think that it may be the best thing in the long run if she is impeding the teachings of the church,” he said.

Instead of praying for Brown’s intervention to save Vianney’s job, “this parish would be better served if they would have a prayer vigil in support of the teachings of the church,” Sundstedt said
Step down and a public rebuke from the bishop is in order.
 
40.png
TPJCatholic:
fix,

There are a ton of prophecies that speak about the time when people within the faith would step into apostacy. I think we are seeing that time.
I have a devotion to Our Lady of Akita.
 
I believe it says she has been promised a contract which means she will be back at the school. Notice they even stated to tell everyone to not come to the protest meeting.

beckers
 
fix,

Having a devotion to Our Lady is always a very good thing indeed. 🙂

We cannot say that Heaven has not spoken.
 
fix,

Here is a sobering excerpt from Our Lady’s statements at Akita:

"The work of the devil will infiltrate even into the Church in such a way that one will see cardinals opposing cardinals, bishops against other bishops. The priests who venerate me will be scorned and opposed by their confreres (other priests). Churches and altars will be sacked. The Church will be full of those who accept compromises and the demon will press many priests and consecrated souls to leave the service of the Lord."
 
40.png
TPJCatholic:
fix,

Here is a sobering excerpt from Our Lady’s statements at Akita:

"The work of the devil will infiltrate even into the Church in such a way that one will see cardinals opposing cardinals, bishops against other bishops. The priests who venerate me will be scorned and opposed by their confreres (other priests). Churches and altars will be sacked. The Church will be full of those who accept compromises and the demon will press many priests and consecrated souls to leave the service of the Lord."
Indeed, is this not happening as we speak?

And let us not forget who the the finally OK to the apparition in 1988 from Rome…the current Pope.
 
fix,

I don’t get your statement about the current Pope, can you clarify?
 
No one who opposes catholic doctrine should be allowed to teach or run a catholic school. That includes priests, nuns and laity.
 
Penny Plain. Johnny going down on Franky is as disgusting as sex involving blood and feces. Most people know this is disgusting abnormal behavior.The insinuation that gay men don’t engage in anal sex is false.Historically, the use of the nitrite inhalants (amyl nitrite, butyl nitrite, isobutyl nitrite, etc.) for recreational purposes has been limited almost entirely to gay men.The first reports of recreational use date from the early 1960s, after the amyl nitrite prescription requirement was eliminated by the FDA. The drug appeared to intensify and prolong the sensation of orgasm. It facilitated anal intercourse, by relaxing the by relaxing the smooth sphincter muscles and deadening the sense of pain.(3)
 
40.png
Dandilion:
Penny Plain. Johnny going down on Franky is as disgusting as sex involving blood and feces. Most people know this is disgusting abnormal behavior.The insinuation that gay men don’t engage in anal sex is false.Historically, the use of the nitrite inhala nts (amyl nitrite, butyl nitrite, isobutyl nitrite, etc.) for recreational purposes has been limited almost entirely to gay men.The first reports of recreational use date from the early 1960s, after the amyl nitrite prescription requirement was eliminated by the FDA. The drug appeared to intensify and prolong the sensation of orgasm. It facilitated anal intercourse, by relaxing the by relaxing the smooth sphincter muscles and deadening the sense of pain.(3)

**Abomination:banghead: **
 
40.png
Thekla:
What does that mean “present themselves as a couple?” They can’t both be there? They can’t stand next to one another? They can’t hold hands? They can’t make out in the back row? What does it mean?

This is not about the “cafeteria” but about the children. We have the children of gay couples at my school and no one pays much attention to them. This school has painted a sign on their foreheads and is now rubbing salt in the wound; they already know they are different. I just find this intolerance unacceptable and morally wrong.
Dear Thelka,

Please read the “Considerations” from the Vatican
vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20030731_homosexual-unions_en.html
From the Considerations Regarding…

It might be asked how a law can be contrary to the common good if it does not impose any particular kind of behaviour, but simply gives legal recognition to a* de facto* reality which does not seem to cause injustice to anyone. In this area, one needs first to reflect on the difference between homosexual behaviour as a private phenomenon and the same behaviour as a relationship in society, foreseen and approved by the law, to the point where it becomes one of the institutions in the legal structure. This second phenomenon is not only more serious, but also assumes a more wide-reaching and profound influence, and would result in changes to the entire organization of society, contrary to the common good. Civil laws are structuring principles of man’s life in society, for good or for ill. They “play a very important and sometimes decisive role in influencing patterns of thought and behaviour”.(14) Lifestyles and the underlying presuppositions these express not only externally shape the life of society, but also tend to modify the younger generation’s perception and evaluation of forms of behaviour. Legal recognition of homosexual unions would obscure certain basic moral values and cause a devaluation of the institution of marriage.

As experience has shown, the absence of sexual complementarity in these unions creates obstacles in the normal development of children who would be placed in the care of such persons. They would be deprived of the experience of either fatherhood or motherhood. Allowing children to be adopted by persons living in such unions would actually mean doing violence to these children, in the sense that their condition of dependency would be used to place them in an environment that is not conducive to their full human development. This is gravely immoral and in open contradiction to the principle, recognized also in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, that the best interests of the child, as the weaker and more vulnerable party, are to be the paramount consideration in every case
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top