Eligibility for federal voting doesn’t fall under state’s rights, California can’t, nor can any other state, allow non-citizens to vote in federal elections. CA lets them vote on local elections and ordinances like school boards and such.
Yes, I understand what the law states but then there is the proclivity of those in power to not follow the law, precisely. What the law states and what people do do not always align completely.HarryStotle:
Eligibility for federal voting doesn’t fall under state’s rights, California can’t, nor can any other state, allow non-citizens to vote in federal elections. CA lets them vote on local elections and ordinances like school boards and such.
Let’s get this correct, it’s Democrats in California who let non-citizens vote.
One credentialed auditor for every ten tables in Georgia.HarryStotle:
Turning this election into a morass of unfounded innuendo and accusation is a cure for whom, again, exactly?
…and yet to be substantiated. Hence, “poisoning the waters”.
It looks like there is testimony to evidence of fraud in the 2020 presidential election.
You might want to view this.HarryStotle:
Hmm… not seeing it. Here’s what Trump did to attempt to ‘steal the election’:
- poison the waters for months in advance, in claiming non-existent fraud
- refuse to assent to the standards of American elections – that is, conceding when one has lost
- prime the pump by destabilizing the process, far in advance and in an ongoing way
- claiming “I won” far in advance of anything approaching a sufficient count of votes
- calling for counting to stop, while only in-person votes had been counted
Except that I’m not calling for Trump and his actions to be ‘audited’, in such as way as to nullify the express will of the people.
You might be.
The Dems and their propagandists in the media have poisoned the waters for the last 4 years.
Until the electors cast their votes, he hasn’t lost anything and Joe Biden is the “President- elect” of nothing. I see, so he can’t use his rights to contest the fraudulent process that has taken place?
Mail in voting destabilized the process and was brought to the nation by the Democrats.
He can claim anything he wants, just as the Dems and their fellow travellers have.
He merely called for the counting (fraud) stop, the Democrat election workers actually did stop the counting in several states - to fix the election for Biden of course!
I know in my area when you request an absentee ballot you request it and give your social security , number, signature and you send it to the town clerk’s office to be verified. The town clerk has all the records of births, marriage and deaths. Is is not just willy-nilly.HarryStotle:
Exactly. I am a registered voter and have indicated that I want to continue voting “absentee”. In Florida, my signature is confirmed before my ballot is accepted. Thank you Gov. DeSantis for making sure the state wide voting went off without a hitch, even notoriously problem prone Broward county had all their votes in on time this year.
That’s his favourite hit. I don’t think not being persuaded by it indicates one has not “[kept] up with the news.” He was pushing the same story 4 years ago.
“monitor”, not “auditor”. And, it looks like they’re merely the observers. So, yeah… they’re observing. What’s the problem?
So, here’s the thing: she didn’t say that she had a witness to fraud in this election; rather, she says she has a witness to fraud in Latin American elections. Then, she waves her arms and says “the same thing is happening here!” That’s not a witness to fraud here – that’s an unsubstantiated assertion, using smoke and mirrors! (“Hey, it rained cotton candy in Dallas and Houston… and the floors are sticky in Savannah! Clearly, it rained cotton candy there, too!”
)That’s not what she said, though. She said he witnessed fraud in Latin America, and his opinion is that the same thing is happening here. So, he’s not a ‘witness’ here, but merely offering a second-hand opinion.
Look – I don’t think any reasonable person would say that there are never any errors in the process. However, that’s not the claim you’re making: you’re claiming widespread, intentional, and systematic tampering with results in the Presidential election. This story shows none of those features. Holding it up and saying “see! I’m right!” is a red herring.
From the declaration she’s quoting:
This continuance was made in September. Curiously, it happened in the same time frame as the polls that showed Trump to be behind, and in the same time frame that Trump himself was doing what he claimed foreign powers were doing – namely, “to interfere in or undermine public confidence in United States elections, including… distribution of propaganda and disinformation”.
He has every right to attempt to prove that the process was fraudulent. He doesn’t have the right to merely assert baldly that it is so, and get the election tossed by force of executive fiat. His lawyers – who, as we’re seeing, are bailing like rats off a sinking ship – are leaving his team, as it becomes more and more evident that his claims are fallacious and malicious.
I suppose you haven’t heard about the campaigns targeting the legal firms, by large fund-raisers like the Lincoln Project, threatening them with loss of income?
This is not so, some of his lawyers reportedly were doxxed.
Is there anything at all that could convince you Trump lost fairly, even if Trump still insists he didn’t?
When fair and full audits have been done at least in the states still in play and others if the evidence points there.HarryStotle:
Is there anything at all that could convince you Trump lost fairly, even if Trump still insists he didn’t?
Will you be convinced when the Supreme Court refuses to hear any of his cases?
My answer would be “yes.” I follow the evidence, and the rule of law.
