G
GaryTaylor
Guest
news.yahoo.com/ukraine-crisis-gives-nato-west-no-good-options-152715401–finance.html
LONDON-No good options
LONDON-No good options
This part of the article was interesting:
Some analysts explicitly compare events in Crimea with Nazi Germany’s 1938 annexation of Czechoslovakia’s German-speaking Sudetenland, followed months later by the rest of the country and the next year by Poland, sparking the Second World War.
The important thing now, they argue, is to make sure Russia understands which lines - such as those around NATO Baltic members - really cannot be crossed.
In Poland, Prime Minister Donald Tusk said the Ukrainian conflict could accelerate Warsaw’s efforts to modernize the army and gain energy independence.
Ukrainian, well until recently. Putin has been handing out Russian passports to any Russian speaking person who asks for one.No one has been able to answer me:
Are the ethnic Russians who “need protection” Russian or Ukrainian citizens?
bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-2640508216:20: Damon Wilson writing for the Atlantic Council think tank says: “The classic Putin playbook is now on display: fuel separatist sentiments, justify military action by asserting the need to protect ethnic Russians (or at least passport holders), and then “maintain the peace” by stationing Russian forces permanently. In effect, dismember your weak neighbors.”
Did you mean stopping Western Ukraine from going to Poland or Europe? Sorry, I don’t understand this sentence.My only question in this is why is it in Putin’s interest to separate Ukraine. Right now he has a huge population there that wants current closer ties with Russia, if Ukraine breaks there will be nothing stopping Western Ukraine from going to Moscow.
In general, I think they want to protect both Russian citizens and Russian speakers from people who have the attitudes you expressed in your post.No one has been able to answer me:
Are the ethnic Russians who “need protection” Russian or Ukrainian citizens?
I know that Russia stocked the Ukrainian pond many years ago with its own people, and instituted laws to suppress Ukrainian language and culture.
I’m ambivalent. If these ethnic Russians are Russian citizens, can or should they be deported to Russia? Can Ukraine use existing national borders to expel the non citizens?
You want your people so badly, take 'em home.
Or, is sending in protection for ethnic Russians in a soverign nation akin to a jihad, like the Bosniacs calling for help from the middle east in the 90s? (Not comparing the Balkan war to this, but the call for warriors to help.)
OK, let’s get this straight. There are no international agreements that say that one country has the right to protect people who speak a certain language from the internal affairs of another nation. In other words, the UK does not have a right to invade France to protect English speaking Frenchmen.In general, I think they want to protect both Russian citizens and Russian speakers from people who have the attitudes you expressed in your post.
Amen to that. Why certain others are incapable of recognising this basic premise of international law is quite beyond me.OK, let’s get this straight. There are no international agreements that say that one country has the right to protect people who speak a certain language from the internal affairs of another nation. In other words, the UK does not have a right to invade France to protect English speaking Frenchmen.
Russia is invading the Ukraine on the same pretense Germany invaded the Sudetenland. It was illegal then, and it is illegal now.
Berezovsky is part of the “new Crimea government” which was created last week and has pledged loyalty to Russia, not the Ukraine. In the US we would tall them traitors.The Ukrainian Navy seems now to be on the side of the Crimean people.
rt.com/news/ukraine-military-russia-resign-437/
“Newly appointed Navy Chief rear admiral Denis Berezovsky has sworn allegiance to the people of Crimea, the news agency reported.”
And, let’s get this straight. Germany did not randomly invade the Sudetenland in a manner similar to what is going on right now in Crimea.OK, let’s get this straight. There are no international agreements that say that one country has the right to protect people who speak a certain language from the internal affairs of another nation. In other words, the UK does not have a right to invade France to protect English speaking Frenchmen.
Russia is invading the Ukraine on the same pretense Germany invaded the Sudetenland. It was illegal then, and it is illegal now.
As long as the pro sovereign Ukraine people continue to splinter into radical factions, the better Putin looks.Amen to that. Why certain others are incapable of recognising this basic premise of international law is quite beyond me.
It’s covered under the UN’s Office of The Special. Adviser on The Prevention of Genocide, and we all know how effective that is.OK, let’s get this straight. There are no international agreements that say that one country has the right to protect people who speak a certain language from the internal affairs of another nation. In other words, the UK does not have a right to invade France to protect English speaking Frenchmen.
Russia is invading the Ukraine on the same pretense Germany invaded the Sudetenland. It was illegal then, and it is illegal now.
Not quite. On September 12th 1938 Hitler encouraged Konrad Henlein, leader of the Sudeten German Nazi Party, to rise up against the Prague government and split the Sudetenland off from Czechoslovakia to join the Reich.And, let’s get this straight. Germany did not randomly invade the Sudetenland in a manner similar to what is going on right now in Crimea.
Germany invaded Sudetenland and annexed it after the UK and France very foolishly told Hitler it would be acceptable for him to do so.
Putin/Russia is sending more troops into a province that they already have a military presence in, because the autonomous province is in a serious dispute with a new and perhaps illegitimate national government days after it was installed, and does not have adequate forces to protect themselves from an assault from said government.
Those are two very different situations.