Has anyone ever proven that the Bible is the distorted Word of God?
That is an absurd question suitable only for an uneducated high school debate. If someone or some organization is going to make a claim of Divine Revelation, it is up to them to satisfactorily prove it - not for others to disprove. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. Deal with it.
The Bible isn’t a dictation from God to man. I don’t know where you got that impression.
Obviously, since I never made that claim, you must mean “Where did I get the impression that Catholics in particular or Christians in general make that claim?”. Fair enough.
I get that impression from the way chapter and verse are quoted and from the way theologies are built up. These interpretations and extrapolations require that biblical writings are unerringly, 100% accurately, the “Word of God”.
It is the guided revelation of God through man. Man is his creation, and he uses man to reveal himself to mankind. Inspiration comes from God, the Bible is a compilation of such inspired revelations but it is not dictated.
Now “inspired revelations that aren’t dictated” is another story entirely. That necessarily admits to the coloration of the inspiration by the consciousness of the recipient of the inspiration. i.e. error is introduced by the imperfect human recipient. At this point you cannot extrapolate precise, indisputable arguments or theologies. The “coloration” will just keep magnifying the errors the further the extrapolated theology develops.
Let’s be clear here: The Catholic Church
is the One True Church of Jesus Christ. You don’t believe that.
Let’s be honestly clear here: “You, (and many others), believe the Catholic Church
is the One True Church of Jesus Christ.” And yes, I don’t.
You have your reasons and your explanations for that disbelief and you’ve shared them, but you haven’t addressed the original question.
Do you think Catholics bashing is popular?
True, I got into this discussion via responding to specific posts and have not directly addressed the original question.
I believe the issue is quite complex from several angles.
To start I’ll quote a definition of bashing that I believe is appropriate here: “The pejorative bashing implies excessive or unwarranted criticism on a subject, group or individual.”
Several people have posted their views on the matter already, and even though they sometimes stated their disagreements with each other, I believe real world specific examples could be found for every scenario mentioned so far. While in each category given by others there will be examples of shallow people who fully fit the bashing definition above, I believe there are many more whose actions/words can’t be considered unwarranted or even excessive. Some of the previous posters have given scenarios where that would be the case.
Another thing to consider (seeing as how the vast majority of Catholics are still imperfectly human) is "Are non-Catholics sometimes unintentionally or even intentionally holding up a “mirror”? Would there be any reason for a non-Catholic or even non-Christian person to be offended or feel “excessively or unwarrantedly criticized” by a group of people claiming to have the “only” path to God telling them to join or go to hell? Also, refuse to prove their claims other than to quote senior members of their group interpreting a document simply assumed to be the “Word of God”? Or how about those Catholics whose lives don’t remotely express true spiritual development publicly making a***s of themselves in the name of the Church? (Believe me, I am in no way putting any of you on this forum in that last category. But I’m sure all of you have met or been aware of someone who is in that category). Also, there is the category of those who, with reason, sincerely disagree and won’t back down.
So warranted vs. unwarranted. I think several posters have given good perspectives on that - at least with rereading their posts with an eye to that issue.
Regarding excessive. When two things are in opposition, excessive is a relative term. If someone bumps into you accidentally and you knock them down and curse them - that would certainly be excessive. If someone threatens your life credibly with a gun and you kill them first in self-defense, I wouldn’t call that excessive.
So, where does that put us in theological or philosophical oppositions or discussions?
Humor me for a moment and temporarily set aside you beliefs in Church doctrine. How do claims of the nature and identity of God and the process of the path to God rate on the intensity scale? (OK, grab your beliefs back, that’s long enough.
![Winking face :wink: 😉](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png)
)
Are you trying to offer a justifiable explanation for why Catholics are bashed? If so, I’m not able to connect the dots so far.
For the real cases of shallow people simply attacking for no good reason, there is no justifiable excuse - not on either side of the table.
Then there’s the whole gradient of more or less excessive or unwarranted criticism. That, I believe, would be the responsibility of whichever party in the dispute happened to be more spiritually mature to guide the discussion to a more mutually useful spiritual direction. And since non other than God can make that judgement accurately, both sides should accept responsibility - but without assuming they are the more spiritually qualified.
I pray that everyone on this planet grows in Truth. Not anyone’s written, oral, or imagined idea of Truth, but just Truth - with no preconceptions of how God might make that happen in each individual case.