Q
QContinuum
Guest
She has the freedom to have sex with anyone of age who also consents. That is a fact.Kamala Harris is the opposite of this. She has used her sexually to seek postitons that should go to other capable woman.
She has the freedom to have sex with anyone of age who also consents. That is a fact.Kamala Harris is the opposite of this. She has used her sexually to seek postitons that should go to other capable woman.
She took jobs away from other capable women by doing so. There is something wrong with that. She used her sex to gain favor.And what is wrong with that? She didn’t grab his member and force him to have sex with her did she? I imagine he was compelled only by his own lust, which he is responsible for. As she is for her own.
Irrelevant. It was consensual and both were of age. No laws broken. Trump has also had partners many years younger.She was 29 and he was 60.
It was consenual between Harvey Weinstein and his victims but it was not right. It is a misuse of power.Irrelevant. It was consensual and both were of age. No laws broken. Trump has also had partners many years younger.
If his partners were not of legal age then it was not consensual because they were not of legal age to give consent. His victims were underage. That’s why it was illegal.It was consenual between Harvey Wesinstein and his victims but it was not right
These girls.women were of legal and they consented to sex with him but it was an abuse of power.gam197:![]()
If his partners were not of legal age then it was not consensual because they were not of legal age to give consent. His victims were underage. That’s why it was illegalIt was consenual between Harvey Wesinstein and his victims but it was not right
The thread isn’t about Trump, there are already plenty here on him. This thread is on Kamala Harris. This is a forum, we have free speech to discuss the issues.Do Trump supporters actually not understand that when they decided to support Trump despite his many affairs, multiple divorces and remarriages, that they ceded moral credibility with regards to judging other candidates on the basis of sexual misconduct?
Enough. Criticize Harris on the grounds of her record, her stance on issues, her stated plans. Do not waste my time trying to undermine her because of what she got up to during an affair. If that’s your angle of attack, all you have is a double standard and a yawn from me.
Well, not Absolute Free Speech. But that’s another matter.This is a forum, we have free speech to discuss the issues.
We are discussing her suitability for executive office
Could you please cite your sources that the GOP has a plan to make the election about Sen. Harris’ sex life? This has been in the press for a long time.Wow, what a great plan for the GOP. Let’s make the election about Sen. Harris’ sex life! How could that possibly back fire?
Little proof of what? That Trump has cheated on his wife, divorced and remarried, has been accused by multiple women of sexual assault, and has stated he grabs women’s genitals is all a matter of record. Your aspersion on my character, notwithstanding, my statements and questions have been straightforward.We have little proof of what you assert and it seems to just border on making scurrilous accusations and derails the thread.