Hi Steve, long time no see.
Since you are using Jason DeBuhn to support your point of argument based upon proof by authority, we must be assured of Mr. Debuhn’s authority to make the claims he makes for us to be convinced, correct? Let’s take a look at Mr. DeBuhn shall we?
BeDuhn received his Master of Arts in Theological Studies from Harvard Divinity School. This degree requires an intermediate level of competence in Greek. BeDuhn’s PhD from the University of Indiana is in Comparative Religious Studies, not in Biblical languages. He is not recognized in the scholarly community as an expert in Biblical Greek. |
source|
BeDuhn attempted to defend the NWT to Catholic apologist John Pacheco. You’ll find their discussion of John 1:1
here.
BeDuhn’s argument is that John’s beliefs about God were not consistent with those professed in Deuteronomy. John is not “concerned” with the radical monotheistic commitment of Deuteronomy, BeDuhn suggests. He tells us that Paul does not “control” what John meant and vice versa. However, those who hold to the harmony of Scripture - as do Jehovah’s Witnesses - do not accept this necessary presupposition. Therefore both Trinitarians and Witnesses should reject his conclusions, for they are based on presuppositions with which we cannot agree. | This is the conclusion of Topic Studies Researchers. |