C
CarmeliteKnight
Guest
I wish the bishop would do that to my community. This is awesome!
Everyone insists on their own way.love doesn’t insist on its own way
Anyone can feel sad about anything, so whether this should get a special priviledge isn’t clear-cut.You’d have to ask everyone in the community that got sprayed how they felt about it to figure that one out…
It is because using a crop duster isn’t reverent. So, in other words, it is about whether or not the sacramental was used in an appropriate manner.It baffles me how other Christians think this is problematic. I just don’t get it.
It is not noticeable.You can “bless” a town without spraying the unwilling with water.
Your objections up thread hold no more weight as they too are subjective.Reverence is mostly subjective.
But that is still getting blessed against their will. Again it’s no different. It’s literally just water. Holy water that could potentially exorcize evil away from the town. Holy water that could bring the Holy Spirit into someone and get them converted.You can “bless” a town without spraying the unwilling with water
I was talking about the water.To who? It is presumably presumable to God. If you pray for someone to be blessed, does that person have to have knowledge of it to be efficacious?
Thank you for making mine.Thanks for making my point.
The prudent use of sacramentals is important so that they aren’t presented to the public in the wrong light. Mum used to tell us the story of an old Irish mother who had a holy water font at the front door. If people didn’t bless themselves as they entered, she would flick some water at them. It resulted in some young people making a mockery of the practice by flicking holy water at each other in an inappropriate way.Would it be more “reverent” if it was sprinkled out of a plane with a watering can?
Reverence is mostly subjective.
Spraying holy water over people isn’t preaching. That’s a very bad comparison.How would you like it if a Muslim came into your church uninvited and started preaching?