And abortion isn’t health care. But I can see the argument, why should one be compelled to pay for military actions they don’t agree with and there are other things we may not personally agree with. However, part of this problem is forcing private companies to pay for this through health care. It’s complex, I’m not sure if I am even stating this correctly.
That is where the courts are open to interpret the Constitution, and weigh the various rights.
If it came down to the courts, I could see a decision to put personal religious freedom over the right to have an abortion. That would be in alignment with my values.
I could also see a very different outcome as possible, in which the court might rule that nobody is forced to have an abortion. Those who oppose abortion for religious reasons, may continue to do so personally. However, and employer does not have this right to refuse to pay for medical care which they do not agree with.
There is a continuing trend to see the right to medical care as a human right, and even a civil right. This has been the point of view in Europe for decades. The tentative efforts in the US with “Obamacare” are another expression of this trend, in the US.
Germans, for example, are appalled when I discuss the issue, and explain to them that in the US, having medical care depends on being able to pay for it, which usually means having an employer. Once someone is seriously ill, then they no longer have an employer, and therefore no way to pay for medical care. Also, the callousness and illogic behind denying insurance to those with pre-existing conditions makes no sense to a German. They see the purpose of a healthcare system to be to provide medical services to those who need it, based on medical need. They tend to see receiving this care as a human rights and social justice issue.